Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-23591
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGutknecht, Jonas-
dc.contributor.authorLoeliger, Teddy-
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-29T10:23:48Z-
dc.date.available2021-11-29T10:23:48Z-
dc.date.issued2021-11-
dc.identifier.isbn978-1-7281-9501-8de_CH
dc.identifier.urihttps://digitalcollection.zhaw.ch/handle/11475/23591-
dc.description.abstractMultipath Interferences (MPI) represent a significant source of error for many 3D indirect time-of-flight (iToF) applications. Several approaches for separating the individual signal paths in case of MPI are described in literature. However, a direct comparison of these approaches is not possible due to the different parameters used in these measurements. In this article, three approaches for MPI separation are compared using the same measurement and simulation data. Besides the known procedures based on the Prony method and the Orthogonal Matching Pursuit (OMP) algorithm, the Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) algorithm is applied to this problem. For real measurement data, the OMP algorithm has achieved the most reliable results and reduced the mean absolute distance error up to 96% for the tested measurement setups. However, the OMP algorithm limits the minimal distance between two objects with the setup used to approximately 2.7 m. This limitation cannot be significantly reduced even with a considerably higher modulation bandwidth.de_CH
dc.language.isoende_CH
dc.publisherIEEEde_CH
dc.rightsLicence according to publishing contractde_CH
dc.subject.ddc621.3: Elektro-, Kommunikations-, Steuerungs- und Regelungstechnikde_CH
dc.titleMulti-layer ToF : comparison of different multipath resolve methods for indirect 3D time-of-flightde_CH
dc.typeKonferenz: Paperde_CH
dcterms.typeTextde_CH
zhaw.departementSchool of Engineeringde_CH
zhaw.organisationalunitInstitute of Signal Processing and Wireless Communications (ISC)de_CH
dc.identifier.doi10.1109/SENSORS47087.2021.9639800de_CH
dc.identifier.doi10.21256/zhaw-23591-
zhaw.conference.detailsIEEE Sensors, online, 31 October - 4 November 2021de_CH
zhaw.funding.euNode_CH
zhaw.originated.zhawYesde_CH
zhaw.publication.statusacceptedVersionde_CH
zhaw.publication.reviewPeer review (Publikation)de_CH
zhaw.title.proceedings2021 IEEE Sensorsde_CH
zhaw.author.additionalNode_CH
zhaw.display.portraitYesde_CH
Appears in collections:Publikationen School of Engineering

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2021_Gutknecht-Loeliger_Multi-layer-ToF-comparison-multipath-resolve-methods_IEEE.pdfAccepted Version884.09 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record
Gutknecht, J., & Loeliger, T. (2021, November). Multi-layer ToF : comparison of different multipath resolve methods for indirect 3D time-of-flight. 2021 IEEE Sensors. https://doi.org/10.1109/SENSORS47087.2021.9639800
Gutknecht, J. and Loeliger, T. (2021) ‘Multi-layer ToF : comparison of different multipath resolve methods for indirect 3D time-of-flight’, in 2021 IEEE Sensors. IEEE. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1109/SENSORS47087.2021.9639800.
J. Gutknecht and T. Loeliger, “Multi-layer ToF : comparison of different multipath resolve methods for indirect 3D time-of-flight,” in 2021 IEEE Sensors, Nov. 2021. doi: 10.1109/SENSORS47087.2021.9639800.
GUTKNECHT, Jonas und Teddy LOELIGER, 2021. Multi-layer ToF : comparison of different multipath resolve methods for indirect 3D time-of-flight. In: 2021 IEEE Sensors. Conference paper. IEEE. November 2021. ISBN 978-1-7281-9501-8
Gutknecht, Jonas, and Teddy Loeliger. 2021. “Multi-Layer ToF : Comparison of Different Multipath Resolve Methods for Indirect 3D Time-of-Flight.” Conference paper. In 2021 IEEE Sensors. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/SENSORS47087.2021.9639800.
Gutknecht, Jonas, and Teddy Loeliger. “Multi-Layer ToF : Comparison of Different Multipath Resolve Methods for Indirect 3D Time-of-Flight.” 2021 IEEE Sensors, IEEE, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1109/SENSORS47087.2021.9639800.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.