Bitte benutzen Sie diese Kennung, um auf die Ressource zu verweisen:
https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-23591| Publikationstyp: | Konferenz: Paper |
| Art der Begutachtung: | Peer review (Publikation) |
| Titel: | Multi-layer ToF : comparison of different multipath resolve methods for indirect 3D time-of-flight |
| Autor/-in: | Gutknecht, Jonas Loeliger, Teddy |
| et. al: | No |
| DOI: | 10.1109/SENSORS47087.2021.9639800 10.21256/zhaw-23591 |
| Tagungsband: | 2021 IEEE Sensors |
| Angaben zur Konferenz: | IEEE Sensors, online, 31 October - 4 November 2021 |
| Erscheinungsdatum: | Nov-2021 |
| Verlag / Hrsg. Institution: | IEEE |
| ISBN: | 978-1-7281-9501-8 |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Fachgebiet (DDC): | 621.3: Elektro-, Kommunikations-, Steuerungs- und Regelungstechnik |
| Zusammenfassung: | Multipath Interferences (MPI) represent a significant source of error for many 3D indirect time-of-flight (iToF) applications. Several approaches for separating the individual signal paths in case of MPI are described in literature. However, a direct comparison of these approaches is not possible due to the different parameters used in these measurements. In this article, three approaches for MPI separation are compared using the same measurement and simulation data. Besides the known procedures based on the Prony method and the Orthogonal Matching Pursuit (OMP) algorithm, the Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) algorithm is applied to this problem. For real measurement data, the OMP algorithm has achieved the most reliable results and reduced the mean absolute distance error up to 96% for the tested measurement setups. However, the OMP algorithm limits the minimal distance between two objects with the setup used to approximately 2.7 m. This limitation cannot be significantly reduced even with a considerably higher modulation bandwidth. |
| URI: | https://digitalcollection.zhaw.ch/handle/11475/23591 |
| Volltext Version: | Akzeptierte Version |
| Lizenz (gemäss Verlagsvertrag): | Lizenz gemäss Verlagsvertrag |
| Departement: | School of Engineering |
| Organisationseinheit: | Institute of Signal Processing and Wireless Communications (ISC) |
| Enthalten in den Sammlungen: | Publikationen School of Engineering |
Dateien zu dieser Ressource:
| Datei | Beschreibung | Größe | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021_Gutknecht-Loeliger_Multi-layer-ToF-comparison-multipath-resolve-methods_IEEE.pdf | Accepted Version | 884.09 kB | Adobe PDF |  Öffnen/Anzeigen |
Zur Langanzeige
Gutknecht, J., & Loeliger, T. (2021, November). Multi-layer ToF : comparison of different multipath resolve methods for indirect 3D time-of-flight. 2021 IEEE Sensors. https://doi.org/10.1109/SENSORS47087.2021.9639800
Gutknecht, J. and Loeliger, T. (2021) ‘Multi-layer ToF : comparison of different multipath resolve methods for indirect 3D time-of-flight’, in 2021 IEEE Sensors. IEEE. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1109/SENSORS47087.2021.9639800.
J. Gutknecht and T. Loeliger, “Multi-layer ToF : comparison of different multipath resolve methods for indirect 3D time-of-flight,” in 2021 IEEE Sensors, Nov. 2021. doi: 10.1109/SENSORS47087.2021.9639800.
GUTKNECHT, Jonas und Teddy LOELIGER, 2021. Multi-layer ToF : comparison of different multipath resolve methods for indirect 3D time-of-flight. In: 2021 IEEE Sensors. Conference paper. IEEE. November 2021. ISBN 978-1-7281-9501-8
Gutknecht, Jonas, and Teddy Loeliger. 2021. “Multi-Layer ToF : Comparison of Different Multipath Resolve Methods for Indirect 3D Time-of-Flight.” Conference paper. In 2021 IEEE Sensors. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/SENSORS47087.2021.9639800.
Gutknecht, Jonas, and Teddy Loeliger. “Multi-Layer ToF : Comparison of Different Multipath Resolve Methods for Indirect 3D Time-of-Flight.” 2021 IEEE Sensors, IEEE, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1109/SENSORS47087.2021.9639800.
Alle Ressourcen in diesem Repository sind urheberrechtlich geschützt, soweit nicht anderweitig angezeigt.