Title: Funktionsbeschreibung in der Begutachtung der Arbeitsfähigkeit : was ist „evidence-based“?
Authors : Canela, Carlos
Schleifer, Roman
Dube, Anish
Hengartner, Michael Pascal
Ebner, Gerhard
Seifritz, Erich
Liebrenz, Michael
Published in : Psychiatrische Praxis : Sozialpsychiatrie, klinische Psychiatrie, public mental health, Versorgungsforschung
Volume(Issue) : 43
Issue : 2
Pages : 74
Pages to: 81
Publisher / Ed. Institution : Georg Thieme Verlag
Issue Date: 2016
License (according to publishing contract) : Licence according to publishing contract
Type of review: Peer review (Publication)
Language : German
Subjects : Fähigkeitsstörungen; Arbeitsfähigkeit; Psychische Störungen; ICF; Gutachten; Capacity disorders; Functional capacity evaluation; Mental disorder; Sick leave
Subject (DDC) : 616.89: Mental disorders, clinical psychology and psychiatry
658.3: Human resource management
Abstract: Ziel: Ziel der vorliegenden Arbeit ist es, einen Überblick über mögliche Instrumente zur Bemessung der Funktionsfähigkeit bei der gutachterlichen Einschätzung der beruflichen Leistungsfähigkeit zu geben. Methode: Systematische Literaturrecherche. Ergebnisse: Es konnten verschiedene Instrumente identifiziert werden, von denen allerdings keines speziell für psychiatrische Fragestellungen konzipiert und für den gutachterlichen Bereich validiert worden ist. Schlussfolgerungen: Die Entwicklung eines spezifischen Instruments zur Funktionsbeschreibung im gutachterlichen Bereich könnte sinnvoll sein und so die Qualität des Gutachtenprozesses verbessern helfen.
Aim: Occupational capacity evaluations have previously been subject to criticism for lacking in quality and consistency. To the authors’ knowledge, there is no clear consensus on the best way to formally assess functioning within capacity evaluations. In this review we investigated different instruments that are used to assess functioning in occupational capacity evaluations. Methods: Systematic review of the literature. Results: Though several instruments that assess functional capacity were found in our search, a specific validated instrument assessing occupational capacity as part of a larger psychiatric evaluation was not found. The limitations of the existing instruments on assessing functional capacity are discussed. Conclusion: Medical experts relying on instruments to conduct functional capacity evaluations should be cognizant of their limitations. The findings call for the development and use of an instrument specifically designed to assess the functional and occupational capacity of psychiatric patients, which is also likely to improve the quality of these reports.
Departement: Angewandte Psychologie
Publication type: Article in scientific Journal
DOI : 10.1055/s-0035-1552762
ISSN: 0303-4259
1439-0876
URI: https://digitalcollection.zhaw.ch/handle/11475/2265
Appears in Collections:Publikationen Angewandte Psychologie

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.