Publication type: Conference paper
Type of review: Open peer review
Title: Comparison of Dutch and Russian standards for calculating the risks of a vapour cloud explosion
Authors: Leksin, Alexey
Barth, Uli
Adeulov, D.
Mock, Ralf Günter
Proceedings: Safety and reliability : theory and applications
Editors of the parent work: Cepin, Marko
Bris, Radim
Pages: 11
Pages to: 20
Conference details: 27th European Safety and Reliability Conference (ESREL 2017), Portoroz, Slovenia, 18-22 June 2017
Issue Date: 2017
Publisher / Ed. Institution: Taylor & Francis
Publisher / Ed. Institution: London
ISBN: 978-1-138-62937-0
Language: English
Subjects: Compliance; Explosionsschutz; Risiko
Subject (DDC): 363: Environmental and security problems
Abstract: Methods to calculate effects of the accidental release of hazardous chemicals are documented in various national technical standards, guidelines and other bodies of laws. However, these standards differ in methodological concepts, resources needed and tool support. This may leave room for inconsistencies concerning results and subsequently risks figures. Although these differences complicate the point-by-point comparison of results the set of methodologies offer alternatives to scientists and practitioners when looking for most applicable approaches and potential for optimization in methodology and tool development. The proposed paper furthers the comparison of the forenamed standards in the field of explosion risk assessment. The vapour cloud explosion models base on the multi energy concept. For this a set of similar parameters (e.g., total mass in explosive range, type of an explosion, curve number) in the input data is used. In order to elaborate the variation effects on the computational results, different flammable substances are considered (hydrazine, propane, methyl mercaptan). The results are checked against their impacts on explosion risk figures. The potential risk is incredibly higher in the Russian approach. The paper gives a motivation to research the real vapour cloud explosions and compare these with the existing tools.
Fulltext version: Published version
License (according to publishing contract): Licence according to publishing contract
Departement: School of Engineering
Organisational Unit: Institute of Sustainable Development (INE)
Appears in collections:Publikationen School of Engineering

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.