Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-2731
Title: Objectivity in newsmaking : an argumentative perspective
Authors : Zampa, Marta
Proceedings: Argumentation, Objectivity and Bias : Proceedings of the 11th International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA), 18-21 May 2016. Windsor, ON
Conference details: Argumentation, Objectivity and Bias : 11th International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA), Windsor, ON, Canada, 18 - 21 May 2016
Editors of the parent work: Bondy, P.
Benacquista, L.
Publisher / Ed. Institution : Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA)
Issue Date: 2016
License (according to publishing contract) : CC BY 4.0: Attribution 4.0 International
Type of review: Not specified
Language : English
Subjects : Objectivity; Aargumentation; Newsmaking; SRG SSR
Subject (DDC) : 070: News media, journalism and publishing
Abstract: Objectivity is a pivotal –  yet controversial –  concept in journalism studies. Scholars disagree on what it precisely implies and on how strictly journalists should stick to it. Adopting an argumentative perspective enables reconstructing how journalists concretely deal with the objectivity requirement, which plays the role of endoxical premise in newsroom argumentative decision-making. The selected case studies shed light on what objectivity means and how journalists achieve it in two Swiss public service television newsrooms.
Departement: Applied Linguistics
Organisational Unit: Institute of Applied Media Studies (IAM)
Publication type: Conference Paper
DOI : 10.21256/zhaw-2731
URI: https://digitalcollection.zhaw.ch/handle/11475/11329
Appears in Collections:Publikationen Angewandte Linguistik

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2016_Zampa_Objectivity in Newsmaking_OSSA 11.pdf1.41 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.