Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-29303
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKowal, Johannes L.-
dc.contributor.authorAuer, Stefan-
dc.contributor.authorSchmutz, Stefan-
dc.contributor.authorGraf, Wolfram-
dc.contributor.authorWimmer, Richard-
dc.contributor.authorTonolla, Diego-
dc.contributor.authorMeulenbroek, Paul-
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-01T17:28:04Z-
dc.date.available2023-12-01T17:28:04Z-
dc.date.issued2023-11-
dc.identifier.issn2410-3888de_CH
dc.identifier.urihttps://digitalcollection.zhaw.ch/handle/11475/29303-
dc.description.abstractIncreased turbulent flow and sediment transport during flood or hydropeaking events often induces rapid changes in underwater sound pressure levels, which is here referred to as soundpeaking. This study is the first to investigate such a change in the underwater soundscape in relation to fish behavior using an experimental approach. Trials were conducted in an experimental channel stocked with either adult chub (Squalius cephalus) or brown trout (Salmo trutta). To mimic soundpeaking, the underwater soundscape of a small alpine river was recorded during a flood event and later played back through an underwater speaker during treatment trials. Furthermore, trials were recorded with a video camera, and based on the fish position, movement variables (swimming distance, number of movement direction changes, variance of the acceleration), the aggregation of individuals, the longitudinal and the lateral position in the experimental area were compared between control (no sound played) and treatment trials. During treatment trials, brown trout changed their movement direction significantly more often, chub showed a significantly higher variation of the acceleration, and individuals from both species were significantly more aggregated. Furthermore, the soundpeaking treatment had a significant effect on the longitudinal position of brown trout in the experimental area. However, the overall results did not provide any indication for a stronger soundpeaking effect in chub despite being equipped with much more refined hearing abilities in comparison to brown trout. Based on these results and findings from other studies, soundpeaking is discussed as a behavioral trigger as well as a source of acoustic stress.de_CH
dc.language.isoende_CH
dc.publisherMDPIde_CH
dc.relation.ispartofFishesde_CH
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/de_CH
dc.subjectBehaviorde_CH
dc.subjectExperimentde_CH
dc.subjectFishde_CH
dc.subjectHydroacousticde_CH
dc.subjectHydropeakingde_CH
dc.subject.ddc551: Geologie und Hydrologiede_CH
dc.subject.ddc590: Tiere (Zoologie)de_CH
dc.titleDoes soundpeaking affect the behavior of chub (Squalius cephalus) and brown trout (Salmo trutta)? : an experimental approachde_CH
dc.typeBeitrag in wissenschaftlicher Zeitschriftde_CH
dcterms.typeTextde_CH
zhaw.departementLife Sciences und Facility Managementde_CH
zhaw.organisationalunitInstitut für Umwelt und Natürliche Ressourcen (IUNR)de_CH
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/fishes8120581de_CH
dc.identifier.doi10.21256/zhaw-29303-
zhaw.funding.euNode_CH
zhaw.issue12de_CH
zhaw.originated.zhawYesde_CH
zhaw.pages.start581de_CH
zhaw.publication.statuspublishedVersionde_CH
zhaw.volume8de_CH
zhaw.publication.reviewPeer review (Publikation)de_CH
zhaw.webfeedÖkohydrologiede_CH
zhaw.author.additionalNode_CH
zhaw.display.portraitYesde_CH
Appears in collections:Publikationen Life Sciences und Facility Management

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2023_Kowal-etal_Does-soundpeaking-affect-the-behavior-of-fishes.pdf4.54 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record
Kowal, J. L., Auer, S., Schmutz, S., Graf, W., Wimmer, R., Tonolla, D., & Meulenbroek, P. (2023). Does soundpeaking affect the behavior of chub (Squalius cephalus) and brown trout (Salmo trutta)? : an experimental approach. Fishes, 8(12), 581. https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes8120581
Kowal, J.L. et al. (2023) ‘Does soundpeaking affect the behavior of chub (Squalius cephalus) and brown trout (Salmo trutta)? : an experimental approach’, Fishes, 8(12), p. 581. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes8120581.
J. L. Kowal et al., “Does soundpeaking affect the behavior of chub (Squalius cephalus) and brown trout (Salmo trutta)? : an experimental approach,” Fishes, vol. 8, no. 12, p. 581, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.3390/fishes8120581.
KOWAL, Johannes L., Stefan AUER, Stefan SCHMUTZ, Wolfram GRAF, Richard WIMMER, Diego TONOLLA und Paul MEULENBROEK, 2023. Does soundpeaking affect the behavior of chub (Squalius cephalus) and brown trout (Salmo trutta)? : an experimental approach. Fishes. November 2023. Bd. 8, Nr. 12, S. 581. DOI 10.3390/fishes8120581
Kowal, Johannes L., Stefan Auer, Stefan Schmutz, Wolfram Graf, Richard Wimmer, Diego Tonolla, and Paul Meulenbroek. 2023. “Does Soundpeaking Affect the Behavior of Chub (Squalius Cephalus) and Brown Trout (Salmo Trutta)? : An Experimental Approach.” Fishes 8 (12): 581. https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes8120581.
Kowal, Johannes L., et al. “Does Soundpeaking Affect the Behavior of Chub (Squalius Cephalus) and Brown Trout (Salmo Trutta)? : An Experimental Approach.” Fishes, vol. 8, no. 12, Nov. 2023, p. 581, https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes8120581.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.