Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-24891
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKaravasiloglou, Nena-
dc.contributor.authorPestoni, Giulia-
dc.contributor.authorDehler, Anna-
dc.contributor.authorSych, Janice Marie-
dc.contributor.authorFaeh, David-
dc.contributor.authorRohrmann, Sabine-
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-28T13:11:51Z-
dc.date.available2022-04-28T13:11:51Z-
dc.date.issued2022-03-21-
dc.identifier.issn1368-9800de_CH
dc.identifier.issn1475-2727de_CH
dc.identifier.urihttps://digitalcollection.zhaw.ch/handle/11475/24891-
dc.description.abstractObjective: Different methods of dietary intake assessment are frequently used to assess a population’s diet. In this study, we aimed to compare the adherence to Swiss food-based dietary guidelines as depicted in two Swiss population-based surveys using different methods of dietary assessment. Design: Two population-based, cross-sectional surveys were compared. In the Swiss Health Survey (SHS), diet was assessed via a short set of questions on specific food groups, while in menuCH by two non-consecutive 24-h dietary recall interviews. Setting: To compare the diet depicted in these surveys, we used the Swiss food-based dietary guidelines on vegetable, fruit, dairy product, meat and meat product, fish and alcohol. The weighted proportion of responders meeting these guidelines was calculated for both surveys and was compared overall and by selected characteristics. Participants: Residents of Switzerland, selected from a stratified random sample of the non-institutionalised residents, who agreed to participate in the respective survey. To ensure comparability between the surveys, the age of the study populations was restricted to 18–75 years. Results: In menuCH, approximately 2 % of responders met ≥4 of the selected Swiss food-based dietary guidelines. In the SHS, using a cruder dietary assessment, the corresponding percentage was 20 %. In both surveys, more women and never smokers were meeting ≥4 food-based dietary guidelines compared to men and current or former smokers, respectively. Conclusions: Our study comparing the diet in two population-based, representative surveys detected large variations in guideline adherence depending on the dietary assessment method used.de_CH
dc.language.isoende_CH
dc.publisherCambridge University Pressde_CH
dc.relation.ispartofPublic Health Nutritionde_CH
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/de_CH
dc.subjectAssessmentde_CH
dc.subjectDietde_CH
dc.subjectFood-based guidelinede_CH
dc.subjectPopulation-basedde_CH
dc.subjectSurveyde_CH
dc.subjectmenuCHde_CH
dc.subject.ddc613.2: Diätetikde_CH
dc.subject.ddc614: Public Health und Gesundheitsförderungde_CH
dc.titleDifferent dietary assessment methods, similar conclusions? : comparison of a country's adherence to food-based dietary guidelines as depicted in two population-based surveys using different dietary assessment methodsde_CH
dc.typeBeitrag in wissenschaftlicher Zeitschriftde_CH
dcterms.typeTextde_CH
zhaw.departementLife Sciences und Facility Managementde_CH
zhaw.organisationalunitInstitut für Lebensmittel- und Getränkeinnovation (ILGI)de_CH
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/S1368980022000647de_CH
dc.identifier.doi10.21256/zhaw-24891-
dc.identifier.pmid35307049de_CH
zhaw.funding.euNode_CH
zhaw.issue9de_CH
zhaw.originated.zhawYesde_CH
zhaw.pages.end2402de_CH
zhaw.pages.start2395de_CH
zhaw.publication.statuspublishedVersionde_CH
zhaw.volume25de_CH
zhaw.publication.reviewPeer review (Publikation)de_CH
zhaw.webfeedErnährungde_CH
zhaw.webfeedHealth Research Hub (LSFM)de_CH
zhaw.webfeedLM-Technologiede_CH
zhaw.funding.zhawWas isst die Schweiz?de_CH
zhaw.author.additionalNode_CH
zhaw.display.portraitYesde_CH
Appears in collections:Publikationen Life Sciences und Facility Management

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2022_Karavasiloglou-etal_Countrys-adherence-to-food-based-dietary-guidelines.pdf402.53 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.