Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-1582
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHengartner, Michael Pascal-
dc.date.accessioned2018-01-29T15:09:18Z-
dc.date.available2018-01-29T15:09:18Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.issn1662-5153de_CH
dc.identifier.urihttps://digitalcollection.zhaw.ch/handle/11475/2253-
dc.description.abstractMajor scientific flaws such as reporting and publication biases are well documented, even though acknowledgment of their importance appears to be lacking in various psychological and medical fields. Subtle and less obvious biases including selective reviews of the literature and empirically unsupported conclusions and recommendations have received even less attention. Using the literature on the association between transition to menopause, hormones and the onset of depression as a guiding example, I outline how such scientific fallacies undermine the validity of neuroendocrinological research. It is shown that in contrast to prominent claims, first, most prospective studies do not support the notion that the menopausal transition relates to increased risk for depression, second, that associations between hormone levels and depression are largely inconsistent and irreproducible, and, third, that the evidence for the efficacy of hormone therapy for the treatment of depression is very weak and at best inconclusive. I conclude that a direct and uniform association between female sex hormones and depression is clearly not supported by the literature and that more attention should be paid to the manifold scientific biases that undermine the validity of findings in psychological and medical research, with a specific focus on the behavioral neurosciences.de_CH
dc.language.isoende_CH
dc.publisherFrontiers Research Foundationde_CH
dc.relation.ispartofFrontiers in Behavioral Neurosciencede_CH
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/de_CH
dc.subject.ddc610: Medizin und Gesundheitde_CH
dc.titleSubtle scientific fallacies undermine the validity of neuroendocrinological research : do not draw premature conclusions on the role of female sex hormonesde_CH
dc.typeBeitrag in wissenschaftlicher Zeitschriftde_CH
dcterms.typeTextde_CH
zhaw.departementAngewandte Psychologiede_CH
zhaw.organisationalunitPsychologisches Institut (PI)de_CH
dc.identifier.doi10.21256/zhaw-1582-
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fnbeh.2017.00003de_CH
zhaw.funding.euNode_CH
zhaw.issue3de_CH
zhaw.originated.zhawYesde_CH
zhaw.publication.statuspublishedVersionde_CH
zhaw.volume11de_CH
zhaw.publication.reviewPeer review (Publikation)de_CH
zhaw.webfeedKlinische Psychologiede_CH
Appears in collections:Publikationen Angewandte Psychologie

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2017_Hengartner_Subtle scientific fallacies_Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience.pdf721.03 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record
Hengartner, M. P. (2017). Subtle scientific fallacies undermine the validity of neuroendocrinological research : do not draw premature conclusions on the role of female sex hormones. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-1582
Hengartner, M.P. (2017) ‘Subtle scientific fallacies undermine the validity of neuroendocrinological research : do not draw premature conclusions on the role of female sex hormones’, Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 11(3). Available at: https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-1582.
M. P. Hengartner, “Subtle scientific fallacies undermine the validity of neuroendocrinological research : do not draw premature conclusions on the role of female sex hormones,” Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, vol. 11, no. 3, 2017, doi: 10.21256/zhaw-1582.
HENGARTNER, Michael Pascal, 2017. Subtle scientific fallacies undermine the validity of neuroendocrinological research : do not draw premature conclusions on the role of female sex hormones. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience. 2017. Bd. 11, Nr. 3. DOI 10.21256/zhaw-1582
Hengartner, Michael Pascal. 2017. “Subtle Scientific Fallacies Undermine the Validity of Neuroendocrinological Research : Do Not Draw Premature Conclusions on the Role of Female Sex Hormones.” Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience 11 (3). https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-1582.
Hengartner, Michael Pascal. “Subtle Scientific Fallacies Undermine the Validity of Neuroendocrinological Research : Do Not Draw Premature Conclusions on the Role of Female Sex Hormones.” Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, vol. 11, no. 3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-1582.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.