Bitte benutzen Sie diese Kennung, um auf die Ressource zu verweisen:
https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-1575
Publikationstyp: | Beitrag in wissenschaftlicher Zeitschrift |
Art der Begutachtung: | Peer review (Publikation) |
Titel: | Public preference of electricity options before and after Fukushima |
Autor/-in: | Rudolf, Michael Seidl, Roman Moser, Corinne Krütli, Pius Stauffacher, Michael |
DOI: | 10.21256/zhaw-1575 10.1080/1943815X.2014.881887 |
Erschienen in: | Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences |
Band(Heft): | 11 |
Heft: | 1 |
Seite(n): | 1 |
Seiten bis: | 15 |
Erscheinungsdatum: | 2014 |
Verlag / Hrsg. Institution: | Taylor & Francis |
ISSN: | 1943-815X |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Fachgebiet (DDC): | 333.79: Energie |
Zusammenfassung: | The accident at the Fukushima nuclear power plant in spring 2011 spurred Germany and Switzerland to phase out nuclear technology. To ensure future electricity supply, this phase-out requires a strong commitment to accept alternative production technologies and energy strategies. This study examined if and how laypeople’s preference for electricity produced by nuclear power and the alternatives in Switzerland has been affected by the Japanese disaster. An online study was conducted in February (N = 69) and repeated in June 2011 (N = 57), applying the same questionnaire to both samples. The study included a preference rating task involving nuclear, gas, photovoltaics, wind power, and hydropower, and choice-based conjoint tasks. The conjoint tasks contained attributes such as production technologies and price instruments. Participants had to choose their preferred combination of attributes. The results show that laypeople’s preference for nuclear power dropped significantly between February and June 2011, whereas their preferences for other technologies changed only marginally. Furthermore, the envisaged mid-term “stepping stones” of gas and electricity imports on the way to renewable energy have been highly unpopular and have remained so after the Fukushima accident. Transitioning from nuclear energy to renewable energy, therefore, will likely be challenging. |
URI: | https://digitalcollection.zhaw.ch/handle/11475/2194 |
Volltext Version: | Publizierte Version |
Lizenz (gemäss Verlagsvertrag): | CC BY 3.0: Namensnennung 3.0 Unported |
Departement: | School of Engineering |
Organisationseinheit: | Institut für Nachhaltige Entwicklung (INE) |
Enthalten in den Sammlungen: | Publikationen School of Engineering |
Dateien zu dieser Ressource:
Datei | Beschreibung | Größe | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
2014_Rudolf_Public preference of electricity options_Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences.pdf | 197.62 kB | Adobe PDF | Öffnen/Anzeigen |
Zur Langanzeige
Rudolf, M., Seidl, R., Moser, C., Krütli, P., & Stauffacher, M. (2014). Public preference of electricity options before and after Fukushima. Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences, 11(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-1575
Rudolf, M. et al. (2014) ‘Public preference of electricity options before and after Fukushima’, Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences, 11(1), pp. 1–15. Available at: https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-1575.
M. Rudolf, R. Seidl, C. Moser, P. Krütli, and M. Stauffacher, “Public preference of electricity options before and after Fukushima,” Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2014, doi: 10.21256/zhaw-1575.
RUDOLF, Michael, Roman SEIDL, Corinne MOSER, Pius KRÜTLI und Michael STAUFFACHER, 2014. Public preference of electricity options before and after Fukushima. Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences. 2014. Bd. 11, Nr. 1, S. 1–15. DOI 10.21256/zhaw-1575
Rudolf, Michael, Roman Seidl, Corinne Moser, Pius Krütli, and Michael Stauffacher. 2014. “Public Preference of Electricity Options before and after Fukushima.” Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences 11 (1): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-1575.
Rudolf, Michael, et al. “Public Preference of Electricity Options before and after Fukushima.” Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences, vol. 11, no. 1, 2014, pp. 1–15, https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-1575.
Alle Ressourcen in diesem Repository sind urheberrechtlich geschützt, soweit nicht anderweitig angezeigt.