Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-1524
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Hengartner, Michael Pascal | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-12-14T14:08:39Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2017-12-14T14:08:39Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2017-12 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1664-0640 | de_CH |
dc.identifier.uri | https://digitalcollection.zhaw.ch/handle/11475/1848 | - |
dc.language.iso | en | de_CH |
dc.publisher | Frontiers Research Foundation | de_CH |
dc.relation.ispartof | Frontiers in Psychiatry | de_CH |
dc.rights | Licence according to publishing contract | de_CH |
dc.subject.ddc | 150: Psychologie | de_CH |
dc.subject.ddc | 615: Pharmakologie und Therapeutik | de_CH |
dc.title | Methodological flaws, conflicts of interest, and scientific fallacies : implications for the evaluation of antidepressants’ efficacy and harm | de_CH |
dc.type | Beitrag in wissenschaftlicher Zeitschrift | de_CH |
dcterms.type | Text | de_CH |
zhaw.departement | Angewandte Psychologie | de_CH |
zhaw.organisationalunit | Psychologisches Institut (PI) | de_CH |
zhaw.publisher.place | Lausanne | de_CH |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.21256/zhaw-1524 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.3389/fpsyt.2017.00275 | de_CH |
zhaw.funding.eu | No | de_CH |
zhaw.originated.zhaw | Yes | de_CH |
zhaw.publication.status | publishedVersion | de_CH |
zhaw.volume | 8 | de_CH |
zhaw.publication.review | Peer review (Publikation) | de_CH |
zhaw.webfeed | Klinische Psychologie | de_CH |
Appears in collections: | Publikationen Angewandte Psychologie |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Antidepressant Efficacy and Harm.pdf | 216.29 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Show simple item record
Hengartner, M. P. (2017). Methodological flaws, conflicts of interest, and scientific fallacies : implications for the evaluation of antidepressants’ efficacy and harm. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 8. https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-1524
Hengartner, M.P. (2017) ‘Methodological flaws, conflicts of interest, and scientific fallacies : implications for the evaluation of antidepressants’ efficacy and harm’, Frontiers in Psychiatry, 8. Available at: https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-1524.
M. P. Hengartner, “Methodological flaws, conflicts of interest, and scientific fallacies : implications for the evaluation of antidepressants’ efficacy and harm,” Frontiers in Psychiatry, vol. 8, Dec. 2017, doi: 10.21256/zhaw-1524.
HENGARTNER, Michael Pascal, 2017. Methodological flaws, conflicts of interest, and scientific fallacies : implications for the evaluation of antidepressants’ efficacy and harm. Frontiers in Psychiatry. Dezember 2017. Bd. 8. DOI 10.21256/zhaw-1524
Hengartner, Michael Pascal. 2017. “Methodological Flaws, Conflicts of Interest, and Scientific Fallacies : Implications for the Evaluation of Antidepressants’ Efficacy and Harm.” Frontiers in Psychiatry 8 (December). https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-1524.
Hengartner, Michael Pascal. “Methodological Flaws, Conflicts of Interest, and Scientific Fallacies : Implications for the Evaluation of Antidepressants’ Efficacy and Harm.” Frontiers in Psychiatry, vol. 8, Dec. 2017, https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-1524.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.