Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-3980
Title: More is not always better : an experimental individual-level validation of the randomized response technique and the crosswise model
Authors : Höglinger, Marc
Jann, Ben
Published in : PLOS ONE
Volume(Issue) : 13
Issue : 8
Pages : 1
Pages to: 22
Publisher / Ed. Institution : Public Library of Science
Issue Date: 2018
License (according to publishing contract) : CC BY 4.0: Attribution 4.0 International
Type of review: Peer review (publication)
Language : English
Subject (DDC) : 000: Generalities and science
Abstract: Social desirability and the fear of sanctions can deter survey respondents from responding truthfully to sensitive questions. Self-reports on norm breaking behavior such as shoplifting, non-voting, or tax evasion may thus be subject to considerable misreporting. To mitigate such response bias, various indirect question techniques, such as the randomized response technique (RRT), have been proposed. We evaluate the viability of several popular variants of the RRT, including the recently proposed crosswise-model RRT, by comparing respondents' self-reports on cheating in dice games to actual cheating behavior, thereby distinguishing between false negatives (underreporting) and false positives (overreporting). The study has been implemented as an online survey on Amazon Mechanical Turk (N = 6, 505). Our results from two validation designs indicate that the forced-response RRT and the unrelated-question RRT, as implemented in our survey, fail to reduce the level of misreporting compared to conventional direct questioning. For the crosswise-model RRT we do observe a reduction of false negatives. At the same time, however, there is a non-ignorable increase in false positives; a flaw that previous evaluation studies relying on comparative or aggregate-level validation could not detect. Overall, none of the evaluated indirect techniques outperformed conventional direct questioning. Furthermore, our study demonstrates the importance of identifying false negatives as well as false positives to avoid false conclusions about the validity of indirect sensitive question techniques.
Departement: School of Management and Law
Organisational Unit: Winterthur Institute of Health Economics (WIG)
Publication type: Article in scientific journal
DOI : 10.21256/zhaw-3980
10.1371/journal.pone.0201770
ISSN: 1932-6203
URI: https://digitalcollection.zhaw.ch/handle/11475/10362
Appears in Collections:Publikationen School of Management and Law

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
More is not always_PLOSONE 2018.pdf1.49 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.