1. ZHAW digitalcollection
  2. School of Management and Law
  3. Publikationen
  4. Publikationen School of Management and Law
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTosun, Jale-
dc.contributor.authorLang, Achim-
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-29T09:44:42Z-
dc.date.available2018-08-29T09:44:42Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.issn0144-2872de_CH
dc.identifier.issn1470-1006de_CH
dc.identifier.urihttps://digitalcollection.zhaw.ch/handle/11475/9881-
dc.description.abstractA growing number of studies have examined the collaboration of actors from two or more policy domains in order to integrate aims and concerns derived from one policy domain into another. In our literature review, we refer to this empirical phenomenon as ‘policy integration’, exemplified by the Health in All Policies approach. Despite the wealth of literature on the subject, the scientific community only has access to a portion of the insights that have come out of this field of research, due primarily to the fact that policy integration is discussed using a variety of different terms, which tend to be specific to the policy domain under investigation. To facilitate a more inclusive scientific debate on policy integration, we provide a comprehensive overview of the different terminologies associated with policy integration and analyse the recurring themes in the respective literature strands. What is the motivation for policy-makers to promote policy integration? What is the design of the instruments used for policy integration? How does policy integration affect the policy-making process? And how well does policy integration perform? These are the four questions guiding our study.de_CH
dc.language.isoende_CH
dc.publisherRoutledgede_CH
dc.relation.ispartofPolicy Studiesde_CH
dc.rightsLicence according to publishing contractde_CH
dc.subjectBoundary-spanning policy regimede_CH
dc.subjectComprehensive planningde_CH
dc.subjectHolistic government and governancede_CH
dc.subjectJoined-up governmentde_CH
dc.subjectPolicy coherencede_CH
dc.subjectPolicy integration and mainstreamingde_CH
dc.subjectWhole of governmentde_CH
dc.subject.ddc320: Politikde_CH
dc.titlePolicy integration : mapping the different conceptsde_CH
dc.typeBeitrag in wissenschaftlicher Zeitschriftde_CH
dcterms.typeTextde_CH
zhaw.departementSchool of Management and Lawde_CH
zhaw.organisationalunitInstitut für Verwaltungs-Management (IVM)de_CH
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/01442872.2017.1339239de_CH
zhaw.funding.euNode_CH
zhaw.issue6de_CH
zhaw.originated.zhawYesde_CH
zhaw.pages.end570de_CH
zhaw.pages.start553de_CH
zhaw.publication.statuspublishedVersionde_CH
zhaw.volume38de_CH
zhaw.publication.reviewPeer review (Publikation)de_CH
Appears in collections:Publikationen School of Management and Law

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Show simple item record
Tosun, J., & Lang, A. (2017). Policy integration : mapping the different concepts. Policy Studies, 38(6), 553–570. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2017.1339239
Tosun, J. and Lang, A. (2017) ‘Policy integration : mapping the different concepts’, Policy Studies, 38(6), pp. 553–570. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2017.1339239.
J. Tosun and A. Lang, “Policy integration : mapping the different concepts,” Policy Studies, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 553–570, 2017, doi: 10.1080/01442872.2017.1339239.
TOSUN, Jale und Achim LANG, 2017. Policy integration : mapping the different concepts. Policy Studies. 2017. Bd. 38, Nr. 6, S. 553–570. DOI 10.1080/01442872.2017.1339239
Tosun, Jale, and Achim Lang. 2017. “Policy Integration : Mapping the Different Concepts.” Policy Studies 38 (6): 553–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2017.1339239.
Tosun, Jale, and Achim Lang. “Policy Integration : Mapping the Different Concepts.” Policy Studies, vol. 38, no. 6, 2017, pp. 553–70, https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2017.1339239.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.