1. ZHAW digitalcollection
  2. Gesundheit
  3. Publikationen
  4. Publikationen Gesundheit
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-2718
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKuster, Roman-
dc.contributor.authorHeinlein, Bernd-
dc.contributor.authorBauer, Christoph-
dc.contributor.authorGraf, Eveline-
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-14T14:39:01Z-
dc.date.available2018-08-14T14:39:01Z-
dc.date.issued2016-06-
dc.identifier.issn0966-6362de_CH
dc.identifier.issn1879-2219de_CH
dc.identifier.urihttps://digitalcollection.zhaw.ch/handle/11475/8959-
dc.description.abstractMotion analysis systems deliver quantitative information, e.g. on the progress of rehabilitation programs aimed at improving range of motion. Markerless systems are of interest for clinical application because they are low-cost and easy to use. The first generation of the Kinect™ sensor showed promising results in validity assessment compared to an established marker-based system. However, no literature is available on the validity of the new 'Kinect™ for Xbox one' (KinectOne) in tracking upper body motion. Consequently, this study was conducted to analyze the accuracy and reliability of the KinectOne in tracking upper body motion. Twenty subjects performed shoulder abduction in frontal and scapula plane, flexion, external rotation and horizontal flexion in two conditions (sitting and standing). Arm and trunk motion were analyzed using the KinectOne and compared to a marker-based system. Comparisons were made using Bland Altman statistics and Coefficient of Multiple Correlation. On average, differences between systems of 3.9±4.0° and 0.1±3.8° were found for arm and trunk motion, respectively. Correlation was higher for the arm than for the trunk motion. Based on the observed bias, the accuracy of the KinectOne was found to be adequate to measure arm motion in a clinical setting. Although trunk motion showed a very low absolute bias between the two systems, the KinectOne was not able to track small changes over time. Before the KinectOne can find clinical application, further research is required analyzing whether validity can be improved using a customized tracking algorithm or other sensor placement, and to analyze test-retest reliability.de_CH
dc.language.isoende_CH
dc.publisherElsevierde_CH
dc.relation.ispartofGait & Posturede_CH
dc.rightsLicence according to publishing contractde_CH
dc.subjectKinect™ for Xbox Onede_CH
dc.subjectKinematicsde_CH
dc.subjectUpper extremityde_CH
dc.subjectValidityde_CH
dc.subjectAdultde_CH
dc.subjectBiomechanical Phenomenade_CH
dc.subjectFemalede_CH
dc.subjectHumansde_CH
dc.subjectJointsde_CH
dc.subjectMalede_CH
dc.subjectMovementde_CH
dc.subjectRange of Motion, Articularde_CH
dc.subjectReproducibility of Resultsde_CH
dc.subjectTorsode_CH
dc.subjectUpper Extremityde_CH
dc.subjectSoftwarede_CH
dc.subject.ddc610: Medizin und Gesundheitde_CH
dc.titleAccuracy of KinectOne to quantify kinematics of the upper bodyde_CH
dc.typeBeitrag in wissenschaftlicher Zeitschriftde_CH
dcterms.typeTextde_CH
zhaw.departementGesundheitde_CH
dc.identifier.doi10.21256/zhaw-2718-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.gaitpost.2016.04.004de_CH
dc.identifier.pmid27264408de_CH
zhaw.funding.euNode_CH
zhaw.originated.zhawYesde_CH
zhaw.pages.end85de_CH
zhaw.pages.start80de_CH
zhaw.publication.statussubmittedVersionde_CH
zhaw.volume47de_CH
zhaw.publication.reviewPeer review (Publikation)de_CH
Appears in collections:Publikationen Gesundheit

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2016_Bauer_Accuracy of KinectOne_Gait and Posture.pdf305.68 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record
Kuster, R., Heinlein, B., Bauer, C., & Graf, E. (2016). Accuracy of KinectOne to quantify kinematics of the upper body. Gait & Posture, 47, 80–85. https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-2718
Kuster, R. et al. (2016) ‘Accuracy of KinectOne to quantify kinematics of the upper body’, Gait & Posture, 47, pp. 80–85. Available at: https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-2718.
R. Kuster, B. Heinlein, C. Bauer, and E. Graf, “Accuracy of KinectOne to quantify kinematics of the upper body,” Gait & Posture, vol. 47, pp. 80–85, Jun. 2016, doi: 10.21256/zhaw-2718.
KUSTER, Roman, Bernd HEINLEIN, Christoph BAUER und Eveline GRAF, 2016. Accuracy of KinectOne to quantify kinematics of the upper body. Gait & Posture. Juni 2016. Bd. 47, S. 80–85. DOI 10.21256/zhaw-2718
Kuster, Roman, Bernd Heinlein, Christoph Bauer, and Eveline Graf. 2016. “Accuracy of KinectOne to Quantify Kinematics of the Upper Body.” Gait & Posture 47 (June): 80–85. https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-2718.
Kuster, Roman, et al. “Accuracy of KinectOne to Quantify Kinematics of the Upper Body.” Gait & Posture, vol. 47, June 2016, pp. 80–85, https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-2718.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.