1. ZHAW digitalcollection
  2. Gesundheit
  3. Publikationen
  4. Publikationen Gesundheit
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-3921
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKamwesiga, Julius T-
dc.contributor.authorvon Koch, Lena-
dc.contributor.authorKottorp, Anders Börje Mauritz-
dc.contributor.authorGuidetti, Susanne-
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-02T08:52:02Z-
dc.date.available2018-08-02T08:52:02Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.issn2050-3121de_CH
dc.identifier.urihttps://digitalcollection.zhaw.ch/handle/11475/8782-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Knowledge is scarce about the impact of stroke in Uganda, and culturally adapted, psychometrically tested patient-reported outcome measures are lacking. The Stroke Impact Scale 3.0 is recommended, but it has not been culturally adapted and validated in Uganda. Objective: To culturally adapt and determine the psychometric properties of the Stroke Impact Scale 3.0 in the Ugandan context on a small scale. Method: The Stroke Impact Scale 3.0 was culturally adapted to form Stroke Impact Scale 3.0 Uganda (in English) by involving 25 participants in three different expert committees. Subsequently, Stroke Impact Scale 3.0 Uganda from English to Luganda language was done in accordance with guidelines. The first language in Uganda is English and Luganda is the main spoken language in Kampala city and its surroundings. Translation of Stroke Impact Scale 3.0 Uganda (both in English and Luganda) was then tested psychometrically by applying a Rasch model on data collected from 95 participants with stroke. Results: Overall, 10 of 59 (17%) items in the eight domains of the Stroke Impact Scale 3.0 were culturally adapted. The majority were 6 of 10 items in the domain Activities of Daily Living, 2 of 9 items in the domain Mobility, and 2 of 5 items in the domain Hand function. Only in two domains, all items demonstrated acceptable goodness of fit to the Rasch model. There were also more than 5% person misfits in the domains Participation and Emotion, while the Communication, Mobility, and Hand function domains had the lowest proportions of person misfits. The reliability coefficient was equal or larger than 0.90 in all domains except the Emotion domain, which was below the set criterion of 0.80 (0.75). Conclusion: The cultural adaptation and translation of Stroke Impact Scale 3.0 Uganda provides initial evidence of validity of the Stroke Impact Scale 3.0 when used in this context. The results provide support for several aspects of validity and precision but also point out issues for further adaptation and improvement of the Stroke Impact Scale.de_CH
dc.language.isoende_CH
dc.publisherSagede_CH
dc.relation.ispartofSAGE Open Medicinede_CH
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/de_CH
dc.subjectStroke Impact Scalede_CH
dc.subjectPatient-reported outcome measurede_CH
dc.subjectRehabilitationde_CH
dc.subject.ddc616.8: Neurologie und Krankheiten des Nervensystemsde_CH
dc.titleCultural adaptation and validation of Stroke Impact Scale 3.0 version in Uganda : a small-scale studyde_CH
dc.typeBeitrag in wissenschaftlicher Zeitschriftde_CH
dcterms.typeTextde_CH
zhaw.departementGesundheitde_CH
zhaw.organisationalunitInstitut für Ergotherapie (IER)de_CH
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/2050312116671859de_CH
dc.identifier.doi10.21256/zhaw-3921-
dc.identifier.pmid27746913de_CH
zhaw.funding.euNode_CH
zhaw.originated.zhawYesde_CH
zhaw.publication.statuspublishedVersionde_CH
zhaw.volume4de_CH
zhaw.publication.reviewOpen peer reviewde_CH
Appears in collections:Publikationen Gesundheit

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2050312116671859.pdf108.2 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record
Kamwesiga, J. T., von Koch, L., Kottorp, A. B. M., & Guidetti, S. (2016). Cultural adaptation and validation of Stroke Impact Scale 3.0 version in Uganda : a small-scale study. SAGE Open Medicine, 4. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050312116671859
Kamwesiga, J.T. et al. (2016) ‘Cultural adaptation and validation of Stroke Impact Scale 3.0 version in Uganda : a small-scale study’, SAGE Open Medicine, 4. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/2050312116671859.
J. T. Kamwesiga, L. von Koch, A. B. M. Kottorp, and S. Guidetti, “Cultural adaptation and validation of Stroke Impact Scale 3.0 version in Uganda : a small-scale study,” SAGE Open Medicine, vol. 4, 2016, doi: 10.1177/2050312116671859.
KAMWESIGA, Julius T, Lena VON KOCH, Anders Börje Mauritz KOTTORP und Susanne GUIDETTI, 2016. Cultural adaptation and validation of Stroke Impact Scale 3.0 version in Uganda : a small-scale study. SAGE Open Medicine. 2016. Bd. 4. DOI 10.1177/2050312116671859
Kamwesiga, Julius T, Lena von Koch, Anders Börje Mauritz Kottorp, and Susanne Guidetti. 2016. “Cultural Adaptation and Validation of Stroke Impact Scale 3.0 Version in Uganda : A Small-Scale Study.” SAGE Open Medicine 4. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050312116671859.
Kamwesiga, Julius T., et al. “Cultural Adaptation and Validation of Stroke Impact Scale 3.0 Version in Uganda : A Small-Scale Study.” SAGE Open Medicine, vol. 4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1177/2050312116671859.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.