Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-3198
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRüesch, Peter-
dc.contributor.authorSchaffert, René-
dc.contributor.authorFischer, Susanne-
dc.contributor.authorFeldman-Stewart, Deb-
dc.contributor.authorRuszat, Robin-
dc.contributor.authorSpörri, Peter-
dc.contributor.authorZurkirchen, Markus-
dc.contributor.authorSchmid, Hans-Peter-
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-14T12:30:18Z-
dc.date.available2018-03-14T12:30:18Z-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.issn0941-4355de_CH
dc.identifier.issn1433-7339de_CH
dc.identifier.urihttps://digitalcollection.zhaw.ch/handle/11475/3763-
dc.descriptionErworben im Rahmen der Schweizer Nationallizenzen (http://www.nationallizenzen.ch)de_CH
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The aims of this study were to analyze agreement on information needs within a group of early-state prostate cancer patients and to compare information preferences of patients with the view of health-care professionals about patients’ needs. Methods: Sample consists of patients (n =128) and six subgroups of health-care professionals (urologists, n=32; nurses, n =95; radiotherapy technologists (RTTs), n =36; medical oncologists, n =19; radiation oncologists, n =12; general practitioners (GPs), n =10). Information needs have been assessed with 92 questions concerning prostate cancer and its treatment. Respondents judged the importance of addressing each question. Within- and between-group agreements of patients and health-care professional groups were estimatedwith raw agreement indices as well as chance-corrected Kappa and Gwet’s AC1 measures. Finally, group-specific core items rated with high importance as well as high agreement were defined. Results: Patients rated on average (median) half, i.e., 51 out 92 items as essential (interquartile range (IQR)=36-66), 26 items as desired (IQR=14-38), and 10 items as avoidable (IQR=2-22). Within-group agreement on the presented information topics is modest for any participating group (AC1patients=0.319; AC1professionals=0.295-0.398). Agreement between patients and professionals is low too (AC1=0.282-0.329). Defining group-specific core sets of information topics results in 51 items being part of at least one core set. Concordance of the item core sets of patients and professionals is moderate with κ=0.38-0.66, sensitivity of professionals’ core sets for patients’ preferences varies between 56 and 74%. Conclusions: Results emphasize the need for dialogue between doctor/professional and patient in identifying the information needed by individual patients and support the importance of shared decision making.de_CH
dc.language.isoende_CH
dc.publisherSpringerde_CH
dc.relation.ispartofSupportive Care in Cancerde_CH
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/de_CH
dc.subjectProstate cancerde_CH
dc.subjectPatient information needde_CH
dc.subjectShared decision makingde_CH
dc.subjectPatient–physician communicationde_CH
dc.subjectHealth professionals’ opinionde_CH
dc.subject.ddc616: Innere Medizin und Krankheitende_CH
dc.titleInformation needs of early-stage prostate cancer patients : within- and between-group agreement of patients and health professionalsde_CH
dc.typeBeitrag in wissenschaftlicher Zeitschriftde_CH
dcterms.typeTextde_CH
zhaw.departementGesundheitde_CH
zhaw.organisationalunitInstitut für Gesundheitswissenschaften (IGW)de_CH
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00520-013-2052-8de_CH
dc.identifier.doi10.21256/zhaw-3198-
zhaw.funding.euNode_CH
zhaw.issue4de_CH
zhaw.originated.zhawYesde_CH
zhaw.pages.end1007de_CH
zhaw.pages.start999de_CH
zhaw.publication.statuspublishedVersionde_CH
zhaw.volume22de_CH
zhaw.publication.reviewPeer review (Publikation)de_CH
Appears in Collections:Publikationen Gesundheit

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Rüesch2014_Article_InformationNeedsOfEarly-stageP.pdf282.1 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.