Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-23566
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCastro Pareja, Paula Mónica-
dc.contributor.authorKammerer, Marlene-
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-29T09:17:36Z-
dc.date.available2021-11-29T09:17:36Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.issn0020-8833de_CH
dc.identifier.issn1468-2478de_CH
dc.identifier.urihttps://digitalcollection.zhaw.ch/handle/11475/23566-
dc.description.abstractDifferential treatment is a key norm in multilateral environmental agreements. Its main objective is to increase compliance and reduce the free-rider problem by apportioning the costs and benefits of implementation more equitably across the parties in an agreement. The question of how to differentiate those burdens is inextricably linked to national interests, and while in some instances differential treatment is well designed and facilitates cooperation, in other cases a rigid divide—or cleavage—leads to a stalemate and constant conflict. This article studies the consequences of differential treatment as institutionalized under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). Previous research has shown that the separation of UNFCCC parties into two opposing groups has deepened the polarization in the negotiations. We identify two causal mechanisms that may have driven this polarization, namely socialization through material incentives and the formation of group identity. We draw on an original dataset that records (dis)agreements between country pairs, coded from negotiation summaries between 1995 and 2013. Using a relational events model, we show that the division of UNFCCC parties into Annex I (with obligations) and non-Annex I (without obligations) is related primarily to material incentives and less to group identity formation.de_CH
dc.language.isoende_CH
dc.publisherOxford University Pressde_CH
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Studies Quarterlyde_CH
dc.rightsLicence according to publishing contractde_CH
dc.subject.ddc363: Umwelt- und Sicherheitsproblemede_CH
dc.titleThe institutionalization of a cleavage : how differential treatment affects state behavior in the climate negotiationsde_CH
dc.typeBeitrag in wissenschaftlicher Zeitschriftde_CH
dcterms.typeTextde_CH
zhaw.departementSchool of Management and Lawde_CH
zhaw.organisationalunitZentrum für Energie und Umwelt (CEE)de_CH
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/isq/sqab045de_CH
dc.identifier.doi10.21256/zhaw-23566-
zhaw.funding.euNode_CH
zhaw.issue3de_CH
zhaw.originated.zhawYesde_CH
zhaw.pages.end698de_CH
zhaw.pages.start683de_CH
zhaw.publication.statusacceptedVersionde_CH
zhaw.volume65de_CH
zhaw.embargo.end2022-04-01de_CH
zhaw.publication.reviewPeer review (Publikation)de_CH
zhaw.funding.snf143539, 171273de_CH
zhaw.webfeedW: Spitzenpublikationde_CH
zhaw.author.additionalNode_CH
zhaw.display.portraitYesde_CH
Appears in collections:Publikationen School of Management and Law

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2021_Castro-Kammerer_Institutionalization-of-a-cleavage.pdfAccepted Version3.54 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record
Castro Pareja, P. M., & Kammerer, M. (2021). The institutionalization of a cleavage : how differential treatment affects state behavior in the climate negotiations. International Studies Quarterly, 65(3), 683–698. https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqab045
Castro Pareja, P.M. and Kammerer, M. (2021) ‘The institutionalization of a cleavage : how differential treatment affects state behavior in the climate negotiations’, International Studies Quarterly, 65(3), pp. 683–698. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqab045.
P. M. Castro Pareja and M. Kammerer, “The institutionalization of a cleavage : how differential treatment affects state behavior in the climate negotiations,” International Studies Quarterly, vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 683–698, 2021, doi: 10.1093/isq/sqab045.
CASTRO PAREJA, Paula Mónica und Marlene KAMMERER, 2021. The institutionalization of a cleavage : how differential treatment affects state behavior in the climate negotiations. International Studies Quarterly. 2021. Bd. 65, Nr. 3, S. 683–698. DOI 10.1093/isq/sqab045
Castro Pareja, Paula Mónica, and Marlene Kammerer. 2021. “The Institutionalization of a Cleavage : How Differential Treatment Affects State Behavior in the Climate Negotiations.” International Studies Quarterly 65 (3): 683–98. https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqab045.
Castro Pareja, Paula Mónica, and Marlene Kammerer. “The Institutionalization of a Cleavage : How Differential Treatment Affects State Behavior in the Climate Negotiations.” International Studies Quarterly, vol. 65, no. 3, 2021, pp. 683–98, https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqab045.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.