Bitte benutzen Sie diese Kennung, um auf die Ressource zu verweisen:
https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-3494| Publikationstyp: | Beitrag in wissenschaftlicher Zeitschrift |
| Art der Begutachtung: | Peer review (Publikation) |
| Titel: | Process evaluation for OptiBIRTH, a randomised controlled trial of a complex intervention designed to increase rates of vaginal birth after caesarean section |
| Autor/-in: | Healy, Patricia Smith, Valerie Savage, Gerard Clarke, Mike Devane, Declan Gross, Mechthild Maria Morano, Sandra Daly, Deirdre Grylka, Susanne Nicoletti, Jane Sinclair, Marlene Maguire, Rebekah Carroll, Margaret Begley, Cecily |
| DOI: | 10.21256/zhaw-3494 10.1186/s13063-017-2401-x |
| Erschienen in: | Trials |
| Band(Heft): | 19 |
| Heft: | 9 |
| Erscheinungsdatum: | 2018 |
| Verlag / Hrsg. Institution: | BioMed Central |
| ISSN: | 1745-6215 1468-6708 1468-6694 |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Schlagwörter: | Complex intervention; Ethnography; Fidelity; Midwifery; Process evaluation; Randomised controlled trial; VBAC |
| Fachgebiet (DDC): | 618: Geburtsmedizin und Hebammenarbeit |
| Zusammenfassung: | Complex interventions encompassing several interconnecting and interacting components can be challenging to evaluate. Examining the underlying trial processes while an intervention is being tested can assist in explaining why an intervention was effective (or not). This paper describes a process evaluation of a pan-European cluster randomised controlled trial, OptiBIRTH (undertaken in Ireland, Italy and Germany), that successfully used both quantitative and qualitative methods to enhance understanding of the underlying trial mechanisms and their effect on the trial outcome. |
| URI: | https://digitalcollection.zhaw.ch/handle/11475/2173 |
| Volltext Version: | Publizierte Version |
| Lizenz (gemäss Verlagsvertrag): | CC BY 4.0: Namensnennung 4.0 International |
| Departement: | Gesundheit |
| Organisationseinheit: | Institut für Hebammenwissenschaft und reproduktive Gesundheit (IHG) |
| Enthalten in den Sammlungen: | Publikationen Gesundheit |
Dateien zu dieser Ressource:
| Datei | Beschreibung | Größe | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Healy et al. 2018.pdf | 489.07 kB | Adobe PDF |  Öffnen/Anzeigen |
Zur Langanzeige
Healy, P., Smith, V., Savage, G., Clarke, M., Devane, D., Gross, M. M., Morano, S., Daly, D., Grylka, S., Nicoletti, J., Sinclair, M., Maguire, R., Carroll, M., & Begley, C. (2018). Process evaluation for OptiBIRTH, a randomised controlled trial of a complex intervention designed to increase rates of vaginal birth after caesarean section. Trials, 19(9). https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-3494
Healy, P. et al. (2018) ‘Process evaluation for OptiBIRTH, a randomised controlled trial of a complex intervention designed to increase rates of vaginal birth after caesarean section’, Trials, 19(9). Available at: https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-3494.
P. Healy et al., “Process evaluation for OptiBIRTH, a randomised controlled trial of a complex intervention designed to increase rates of vaginal birth after caesarean section,” Trials, vol. 19, no. 9, 2018, doi: 10.21256/zhaw-3494.
HEALY, Patricia, Valerie SMITH, Gerard SAVAGE, Mike CLARKE, Declan DEVANE, Mechthild Maria GROSS, Sandra MORANO, Deirdre DALY, Susanne GRYLKA, Jane NICOLETTI, Marlene SINCLAIR, Rebekah MAGUIRE, Margaret CARROLL und Cecily BEGLEY, 2018. Process evaluation for OptiBIRTH, a randomised controlled trial of a complex intervention designed to increase rates of vaginal birth after caesarean section. Trials. 2018. Bd. 19, Nr. 9. DOI 10.21256/zhaw-3494
Healy, Patricia, Valerie Smith, Gerard Savage, Mike Clarke, Declan Devane, Mechthild Maria Gross, Sandra Morano, et al. 2018. “Process Evaluation for OptiBIRTH, a Randomised Controlled Trial of a Complex Intervention Designed to Increase Rates of Vaginal Birth after Caesarean Section.” Trials 19 (9). https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-3494.
Healy, Patricia, et al. “Process Evaluation for OptiBIRTH, a Randomised Controlled Trial of a Complex Intervention Designed to Increase Rates of Vaginal Birth after Caesarean Section.” Trials, vol. 19, no. 9, 2018, https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-3494.
Alle Ressourcen in diesem Repository sind urheberrechtlich geschützt, soweit nicht anderweitig angezeigt.