Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-19598
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGhesla, Claus-
dc.contributor.authorGrieder, Manuel-
dc.contributor.authorSchubert, Renate-
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-05T10:15:30Z-
dc.date.available2020-03-05T10:15:30Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.issn0140-9883de_CH
dc.identifier.issn1873-6181de_CH
dc.identifier.urihttps://digitalcollection.zhaw.ch/handle/11475/19598-
dc.description.abstractChoice defaults are an increasingly popular public policy tool. Yet there is little knowledge of the distributional consequences of such nudges for different groups in society. We report results from an elicitation study in the residential electricity market in Switzerland in which we contrast consumers' actual contract choices under an existing default regime with the same consumers' active choices in a survey presenting the same choice-set without any default. We find that the default is successful at curbing greenhouse gas emissions, but it leads poorer households to pay more for their electricity consumption than they would want to, while leaving a significant willingness to pay for green electricity by richer households untapped.de_CH
dc.language.isoende_CH
dc.publisherElsevierde_CH
dc.relation.ispartofEnergy Economicsde_CH
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/de_CH
dc.subjectChoice defaultde_CH
dc.subjectGreen electricityde_CH
dc.subjectNudgingde_CH
dc.subjectPublic policyde_CH
dc.subject.ddc333.79: Energiede_CH
dc.titleNudging the poor and the rich : a field study on the distributional effects of green electricity defaultsde_CH
dc.typeBeitrag in wissenschaftlicher Zeitschriftde_CH
dcterms.typeTextde_CH
zhaw.departementSchool of Management and Lawde_CH
zhaw.organisationalunitZentrum für Energie und Umwelt (CEE)de_CH
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.eneco.2019.104616de_CH
dc.identifier.doi10.21256/zhaw-19598-
zhaw.funding.euNode_CH
zhaw.issue86de_CH
zhaw.originated.zhawYesde_CH
zhaw.publication.statusacceptedVersionde_CH
zhaw.volume2020de_CH
zhaw.embargo.end2022-03-01de_CH
zhaw.publication.reviewPeer review (Publikation)de_CH
zhaw.webfeedW: Spitzenpublikationde_CH
zhaw.author.additionalNode_CH
Appears in collections:Publikationen School of Management and Law

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2019_Ghesla-etal_Nudging-Poor-Rich.pdfAccepted Version529.62 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record
Ghesla, C., Grieder, M., & Schubert, R. (2020). Nudging the poor and the rich : a field study on the distributional effects of green electricity defaults. Energy Economics, 2020(86). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2019.104616
Ghesla, C., Grieder, M. and Schubert, R. (2020) ‘Nudging the poor and the rich : a field study on the distributional effects of green electricity defaults’, Energy Economics, 2020(86). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2019.104616.
C. Ghesla, M. Grieder, and R. Schubert, “Nudging the poor and the rich : a field study on the distributional effects of green electricity defaults,” Energy Economics, vol. 2020, no. 86, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2019.104616.
GHESLA, Claus, Manuel GRIEDER und Renate SCHUBERT, 2020. Nudging the poor and the rich : a field study on the distributional effects of green electricity defaults. Energy Economics. 2020. Bd. 2020, Nr. 86. DOI 10.1016/j.eneco.2019.104616
Ghesla, Claus, Manuel Grieder, and Renate Schubert. 2020. “Nudging the Poor and the Rich : A Field Study on the Distributional Effects of Green Electricity Defaults.” Energy Economics 2020 (86). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2019.104616.
Ghesla, Claus, et al. “Nudging the Poor and the Rich : A Field Study on the Distributional Effects of Green Electricity Defaults.” Energy Economics, vol. 2020, no. 86, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2019.104616.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.