Full metadata record
|dc.contributor.author||Rauskala, Iris Eliisa||-|
|dc.description.abstract||From an international perspective, there is an ever increasing interest in performance budgeting as documented by the latest OECD study (2007). The best-known, earlier approaches to performance budgets, like the Planning-Programming-Budgeting system (PPBS) in the 1960s, Management by objectives (MBO) and Zero-based budgeting (ZBB) in the 1970s are said to have failed or were unpractical for the one or the other reason, leading Schick (2007) to his famous saying: “Performance budgeting is easy to explain but has been hard to implement.” In his often-quoted 1998 article (Schick 1998), he writes on the necessity of sequencing financial management reforms in order to be able to achieve a status like New Zealand, which has been known for its stringent model of the results-oriented, contractual state, based on easier-to-measure outputs and not outcomes in the beginning, however.||de_CH|
|dc.publisher||European Group for Public Administration EGPA||de_CH|
|dc.rights||Licence according to publishing contract||de_CH|
|dc.subject.ddc||350: Öffentliche Verwaltung||de_CH|
|dc.title||We’re doing reasonably fine, thanks. Why not evaluate what we’re doing? : what evaluation tells us about the state of performance budgeting in Switzerland||de_CH|
|zhaw.departement||School of Management and Law||de_CH|
|zhaw.organisationalunit||Institut für Verwaltungs-Management (IVM)||de_CH|
|zhaw.conference.details||34th EGPA Annual Conference, Bergen, Norway, 5-8 September 2012||de_CH|
|Appears in collections:||Publikationen School of Management and Law|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.