Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-3449
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGross, Mechthild Maria-
dc.contributor.authorMichelsen, Claire-
dc.contributor.authorVaske, Bernhard-
dc.contributor.authorHelbig, Sonja-
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-05T15:16:26Z-
dc.date.available2018-12-05T15:16:26Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.issn0948-2393de_CH
dc.identifier.issn1439-1651de_CH
dc.identifier.urihttps://digitalcollection.zhaw.ch/handle/11475/13580-
dc.descriptionCopyright 2018 Thiemede_CH
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Midwifery models of care help to enhance perinatal health outcomes, women's satisfaction, and continuity of care. Despite the ubiquitous presence of certified midwives at births in Germany, no research has investigated the diversity of midwives’ practice patterns. Describing the variety of working patterns through which midwives provide intrapartum care may contribute to improving the organisation of midwifery services. Methods: This cross-sectional survey took place in the region of Hannover and Hildesheim, Germany. Midwives attending births and practicing in hospitals and/or out-of-hospital were able to participate. Midwives who did not attend births were excluded. We assessed midwives' scope of services, practice locations, employment patterns, continuity of care, midwife-led births, and midwives' level of agreement with core values of midwifery care. The response rate of the survey was 32.7 % (69/211). Results: We found that midwifery care services can be described according to midwives’ employment patterns. The majority of midwives were employed in a hospital to provide intrapartum care (74.2 %, n = 49), and most also independently offered one or more antenatal and/or postpartum service/s. Only 25.8 % (n = 17) of midwives offered their services independently (laborist model of care). Independent midwives attended births in all three possible settings: hospital, free-standing birth centres and home. Significantly more independent midwives than employed midwives offered antenatal care and lactation consulting. Compared to employed midwives, significantly more independent midwives provided antenatal, intrapartum, and postpartum care to the same women, were more likely to know women before labour, and to offer one-to-one care during labour. Discussion: The most common practice pattern among surveyed midwives was ‘employment in a hospital’ for provision of intrapartum care with additional postpartum and few antenatal services provided on an independent basis. Midwives who worked solely independently reported more continuity and one-to-one intrapartum care with women. Most midwives did not work in patterns that offered continuity of care or consistently provide one-to-one care. Future research should assess whether women in Germany desire more services similar to caseload midwifery.de_CH
dc.language.isoende_CH
dc.publisherThiemede_CH
dc.relation.ispartofZeitschrift für Geburtshilfe und Neonatologiede_CH
dc.rightsLicence according to publishing contractde_CH
dc.subject.ddc618: Geburtsmedizin und Hebammenarbeitde_CH
dc.titleIntrapartum care working patterns of midwives : the long road to models of care in germanyde_CH
dc.typeBeitrag in wissenschaftlicher Zeitschriftde_CH
dcterms.typeTextde_CH
zhaw.departementGesundheitde_CH
zhaw.organisationalunitInstitut für Hebammenwissenschaft und reproduktive Gesundheit (IHG)de_CH
dc.identifier.doi10.21256/zhaw-3449-
dc.identifier.doi10.1055/s-0043-122888de_CH
dc.identifier.pmid29341048de_CH
zhaw.funding.euNode_CH
zhaw.issue2de_CH
zhaw.originated.zhawYesde_CH
zhaw.pages.end81de_CH
zhaw.pages.start72de_CH
zhaw.publication.statusacceptedVersionde_CH
zhaw.volume222de_CH
zhaw.embargo.end2019-01-16de_CH
zhaw.publication.reviewPeer review (Publikation)de_CH
Appears in collections:Publikationen Gesundheit

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Gross et al. 2018 ZGN.pdfAccepted Version235.58 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record
Gross, M. M., Michelsen, C., Vaske, B., & Helbig, S. (2018). Intrapartum care working patterns of midwives : the long road to models of care in germany. Zeitschrift Für Geburtshilfe Und Neonatologie, 222(2), 72–81. https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-3449
Gross, M.M. et al. (2018) ‘Intrapartum care working patterns of midwives : the long road to models of care in germany’, Zeitschrift für Geburtshilfe und Neonatologie, 222(2), pp. 72–81. Available at: https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-3449.
M. M. Gross, C. Michelsen, B. Vaske, and S. Helbig, “Intrapartum care working patterns of midwives : the long road to models of care in germany,” Zeitschrift für Geburtshilfe und Neonatologie, vol. 222, no. 2, pp. 72–81, 2018, doi: 10.21256/zhaw-3449.
GROSS, Mechthild Maria, Claire MICHELSEN, Bernhard VASKE und Sonja HELBIG, 2018. Intrapartum care working patterns of midwives : the long road to models of care in germany. Zeitschrift für Geburtshilfe und Neonatologie. 2018. Bd. 222, Nr. 2, S. 72–81. DOI 10.21256/zhaw-3449
Gross, Mechthild Maria, Claire Michelsen, Bernhard Vaske, and Sonja Helbig. 2018. “Intrapartum Care Working Patterns of Midwives : The Long Road to Models of Care in Germany.” Zeitschrift Für Geburtshilfe Und Neonatologie 222 (2): 72–81. https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-3449.
Gross, Mechthild Maria, et al. “Intrapartum Care Working Patterns of Midwives : The Long Road to Models of Care in Germany.” Zeitschrift Für Geburtshilfe Und Neonatologie, vol. 222, no. 2, 2018, pp. 72–81, https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-3449.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.