1. ZHAW digitalcollection
  2. School of Management and Law
  3. Publikationen
  4. Publikationen School of Management and Law
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHetze, Katharina-
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-04T14:21:30Z-
dc.date.available2018-12-04T14:21:30Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.issn1363-3589de_CH
dc.identifier.issn1479-1889de_CH
dc.identifier.urihttps://digitalcollection.zhaw.ch/handle/11475/13495-
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this conceptual paper is to discuss the impact of CSR reporting on the CSR reputation in the light of signalling and stakeholder perception theories. The method used is a literature analysis on CSR and reputation, corporate signalling and signalling CSR. For a more complete picture, the review includes findings on CSR reporting and the perception and evaluation of CSR activities by stakeholders, first for stakeholders in general, but in greater detail for the two specific groups ‘consumers’ and ‘employees’. The paper’s main contribution is a conceptual framework for CSR reporting which explains how a CSR report is a CSR communication signal filtered by the signalling context and the stakeholders’ perception. This includes a discussion of how CSR reporting can modify the outcome for the CSR reputation favourably or unfavourably – which also leads to a modified context for CSR reporting. The paper’s originality lies in the analysis and discussion of both the impacts of signalling theory on CSR reporting and how the interpretation of the signal impacts the CSR reputation. The article thus contributes to the knowledge on CSR reporting and its impact on the formation of CSR reputation.de_CH
dc.language.isoende_CH
dc.publisherPalgrave Macmillande_CH
dc.relation.ispartofCorporate Reputation Reviewde_CH
dc.rightsLicence according to publishing contractde_CH
dc.subjectCSR reportingde_CH
dc.subjectCSR reputationde_CH
dc.subjectConceptual frameworkde_CH
dc.subjectStakeholder perceptionde_CH
dc.subject.ddc658.4: Leitendes Managementde_CH
dc.titleEffects on the (CSR) reputation : CSR reporting discussed in the light of signalling and stakeholder perception theoriesde_CH
dc.typeBeitrag in wissenschaftlicher Zeitschriftde_CH
dcterms.typeTextde_CH
zhaw.departementSchool of Management and Lawde_CH
zhaw.organisationalunitCenter for Corporate Responsibility (CCR)de_CH
dc.identifier.doi10.1057/s41299-016-0002-3de_CH
zhaw.funding.euNode_CH
zhaw.issue3de_CH
zhaw.originated.zhawYesde_CH
zhaw.pages.end296de_CH
zhaw.pages.start281de_CH
zhaw.publication.statuspublishedVersionde_CH
zhaw.volume19de_CH
zhaw.publication.reviewPeer review (Publikation)de_CH
Appears in collections:Publikationen School of Management and Law

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Show simple item record
Hetze, K. (2016). Effects on the (CSR) reputation : CSR reporting discussed in the light of signalling and stakeholder perception theories. Corporate Reputation Review, 19(3), 281–296. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41299-016-0002-3
Hetze, K. (2016) ‘Effects on the (CSR) reputation : CSR reporting discussed in the light of signalling and stakeholder perception theories’, Corporate Reputation Review, 19(3), pp. 281–296. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41299-016-0002-3.
K. Hetze, “Effects on the (CSR) reputation : CSR reporting discussed in the light of signalling and stakeholder perception theories,” Corporate Reputation Review, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 281–296, 2016, doi: 10.1057/s41299-016-0002-3.
HETZE, Katharina, 2016. Effects on the (CSR) reputation : CSR reporting discussed in the light of signalling and stakeholder perception theories. Corporate Reputation Review. 2016. Bd. 19, Nr. 3, S. 281–296. DOI 10.1057/s41299-016-0002-3
Hetze, Katharina. 2016. “Effects on the (CSR) Reputation : CSR Reporting Discussed in the Light of Signalling and Stakeholder Perception Theories.” Corporate Reputation Review 19 (3): 281–96. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41299-016-0002-3.
Hetze, Katharina. “Effects on the (CSR) Reputation : CSR Reporting Discussed in the Light of Signalling and Stakeholder Perception Theories.” Corporate Reputation Review, vol. 19, no. 3, 2016, pp. 281–96, https://doi.org/10.1057/s41299-016-0002-3.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.