Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Meyer-Hauser, Bernhard | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Sieber, Philipp | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2018-11-19T09:46:39Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2018-11-19T09:46:39Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2007 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0003-7877 | de_CH |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://digitalcollection.zhaw.ch/handle/11475/13000 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | An effective legal system requires that confidentiality between client and attorney be protected. Only if the law recognises the confidential nature of the information passing between client and attorney will the client be willing to confide in the attorney and the attorney be able to represent the client’s interests effectively. However, there are major differences between civil law and common law concepts in this respect. In the following discussion, Swiss attorney secrecy serves as an example of the civil law system, whereas English legal professional privilege (LPP) and the US attorney-client privilege (ACP) represent the common law tradition of attorney-related confidentiality. | de_CH |
| dc.language.iso | en | de_CH |
| dc.publisher | Sweet & Maxwell | de_CH |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Arbitration | de_CH |
| dc.rights | Licence according to publishing contract | de_CH |
| dc.subject.ddc | 349: Rechtsvergleichung und ausländisches Recht | de_CH |
| dc.title | Attorney secrecy v attorney-client privilege in international commercial arbitration | de_CH |
| dc.type | Beitrag in wissenschaftlicher Zeitschrift | de_CH |
| dcterms.type | Text | de_CH |
| zhaw.departement | School of Management and Law | de_CH |
| zhaw.funding.eu | No | de_CH |
| zhaw.issue | 73 | de_CH |
| zhaw.originated.zhaw | Yes | de_CH |
| zhaw.pages.end | 188 | de_CH |
| zhaw.pages.start | 148 | de_CH |
| zhaw.publication.status | publishedVersion | de_CH |
| zhaw.volume | 2007 | de_CH |
| zhaw.publication.review | Peer review (Publikation) | de_CH |
| Appears in collections: | Publikationen School of Management and Law | |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Show simple item record
Meyer-Hauser, B., & Sieber, P. (2007). Attorney secrecy v attorney-client privilege in international commercial arbitration. Arbitration, 2007(73), 148–188.
Meyer-Hauser, B. and Sieber, P. (2007) ‘Attorney secrecy v attorney-client privilege in international commercial arbitration’, Arbitration, 2007(73), pp. 148–188.
B. Meyer-Hauser and P. Sieber, “Attorney secrecy v attorney-client privilege in international commercial arbitration,” Arbitration, vol. 2007, no. 73, pp. 148–188, 2007.
MEYER-HAUSER, Bernhard und Philipp SIEBER, 2007. Attorney secrecy v attorney-client privilege in international commercial arbitration. Arbitration. 2007. Bd. 2007, Nr. 73, S. 148–188
Meyer-Hauser, Bernhard, and Philipp Sieber. 2007. “Attorney Secrecy V Attorney-Client Privilege in International Commercial Arbitration.” Arbitration 2007 (73): 148–88.
Meyer-Hauser, Bernhard, and Philipp Sieber. “Attorney Secrecy V Attorney-Client Privilege in International Commercial Arbitration.” Arbitration, vol. 2007, no. 73, 2007, pp. 148–88.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.