Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorEsquenazi, Alberto-
dc.contributor.authorMaier, Irin-
dc.contributor.authorAurich Schuler, Tabea-
dc.contributor.authorBeer, Serafin-
dc.contributor.authorBorggraefe, Ingo-
dc.contributor.authorCampen, Katrin-
dc.contributor.authorLuft, Andreas-
dc.contributor.authorManoglu, Dimitrios-
dc.contributor.authorMeyer-Heim, Andreas-
dc.contributor.authorSpiess, Martina-
dc.contributor.authorWirz, Markus-
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-22T13:59:11Z-
dc.date.available2018-10-22T13:59:11Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.isbn978-3-319-28603-7de_CH
dc.identifier.isbn978-3-319-28601-3de_CH
dc.identifier.urihttps://digitalcollection.zhaw.ch/handle/11475/12029-
dc.descriptionSecond editionde_CH
dc.description.abstractRobots for neurorehabilitation have been designed principally to automate repetitive labor-intensive training and to support therapists and patients during different stages of rehabilitation. Devices designed for body weight-supported treadmill training are promising task-oriented tools intended to assist in the restoration of gait. In early rehabilitation, robots provide a safe environment through the use of a suspension harness and assistance in achieving a more physiological gait pattern while promoting a high number of repetitions. In the later stages of rehabilitation, more sophisticated control strategies, virtual environment scenarios, or the possibility to address specific gait deficits by modulating different parameters extends their application. Scientific and clinical evidence for the effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of these devices exists; however documentation of their comparative advantages to conventional therapies is limited. This might be due to the lack of appropriate selection parameters of locomotor training interventions based on functional impairments. Despite this shortcoming, robotic devices are being integrated into clinical settings with promising results. Appropriate use is dependent on the clinicians’ knowledge of different robotic devices as well as the ability to utilize the devices’ technical features, thereby allowing patients to benefit from robot-aided gait training throughout the rehabilitation continuum with the ultimate goal of safe and efficient overground walking. This chapter will provide an overview on the rationales of introducing robots into the clinic and discuss their value in various neurological diagnoses. In addition, recommendations for goal setting and practice of robot-assisted training based on disease- related symptoms and functional impairment are summarized.de_CH
dc.language.isoende_CH
dc.publisherSpringerde_CH
dc.relation.ispartofNeurorehabilitation technologyde_CH
dc.rightsLicence according to publishing contractde_CH
dc.subject.ddc615.82: Physiotherapiede_CH
dc.subject.ddc617: Chirurgiede_CH
dc.titleClinical application of robotics and technology in restoration of walkingde_CH
dc.typeBuchbeitragde_CH
dcterms.typeTextde_CH
zhaw.departementGesundheitde_CH
zhaw.organisationalunitInstitut für Physiotherapie (IPT)de_CH
zhaw.funding.euNode_CH
zhaw.originated.zhawYesde_CH
zhaw.pages.end248de_CH
zhaw.pages.start223de_CH
zhaw.parentwork.editorDavid J., Reinkensmeyer-
zhaw.parentwork.editorVolker, Dietz-
zhaw.publication.statuspublishedVersionde_CH
zhaw.publication.reviewEditorial reviewde_CH
Appears in Collections:Publikationen Gesundheit

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.