Bitte benutzen Sie diese Kennung, um auf die Ressource zu verweisen: https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-3972
Publikationstyp: Beitrag in wissenschaftlicher Zeitschrift
Art der Begutachtung: Peer review (Publikation)
Titel: Navigating ambiguity : distributive and integrative negotiation tactics in China
Autor/-in: Barthelmess Röthlisberger, Petra
Enzmann, Patricia
Settelen, Michael
Schärmeli, Nicolas
DOI: 10.21256/zhaw-3972
10.18267/j.cebr.197
Erschienen in: Central European Business Review
Band(Heft): 7
Heft: 2
Seite(n): 21
Seiten bis: 43
Erscheinungsdatum: 2018
Verlag / Hrsg. Institution: Oeconomica
ISSN: 1805-4862
1805-4854
Sprache: Englisch
Schlagwörter: Chinese negotiation; Distributive bargaining; Integrative bargaining; Negotiation tactics
Fachgebiet (DDC): 658.4: Leitendes Management
Zusammenfassung: People usually view negotiations as either an integrative process in which both sides can gain (win-win) or a distributive struggle in which one side wins and the other loses (win-lose). Culture affects how people conduct negotiations, and the Chinese people can rely on a long civilizational tradition of both – highly refined integrative as well as smart and ruthless distributive negotiation styles. The coexistence of both styles may lead to ambiguous negotiation situations. The purpose of this study is to explore whether the relationship relevance influences the Chinese people’s choice of negotiation style. We investigated the research question by conducting ten in-depth interviews among European executives with long-term experience in China and analyzed the content of the transcripts by deductively building qualitative categories. The findings indicate that high relationship relevance influences the Chinese negotiation style towards a more collaborative integrative approach. By focusing on the relationship aspect of negotiations, we aim to contribute towards better understanding in an under researched field of relationship’s impact on negotiation.
URI: https://digitalcollection.zhaw.ch/handle/11475/10324
Volltext Version: Publizierte Version
Lizenz (gemäss Verlagsvertrag): CC BY 4.0: Namensnennung 4.0 International
Departement: School of Management and Law
Enthalten in den Sammlungen:Publikationen School of Management and Law

Dateien zu dieser Ressource:
Datei Beschreibung GrößeFormat 
Navigating ambiguity.pdf2.06 MBAdobe PDFMiniaturbild
Öffnen/Anzeigen
Zur Langanzeige
Barthelmess Röthlisberger, P., Enzmann, P., Settelen, M., & Schärmeli, N. (2018). Navigating ambiguity : distributive and integrative negotiation tactics in China. Central European Business Review, 7(2), 21–43. https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-3972
Barthelmess Röthlisberger, P. et al. (2018) ‘Navigating ambiguity : distributive and integrative negotiation tactics in China’, Central European Business Review, 7(2), pp. 21–43. Available at: https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-3972.
P. Barthelmess Röthlisberger, P. Enzmann, M. Settelen, and N. Schärmeli, “Navigating ambiguity : distributive and integrative negotiation tactics in China,” Central European Business Review, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 21–43, 2018, doi: 10.21256/zhaw-3972.
BARTHELMESS RÖTHLISBERGER, Petra, Patricia ENZMANN, Michael SETTELEN und Nicolas SCHÄRMELI, 2018. Navigating ambiguity : distributive and integrative negotiation tactics in China. Central European Business Review. 2018. Bd. 7, Nr. 2, S. 21–43. DOI 10.21256/zhaw-3972
Barthelmess Röthlisberger, Petra, Patricia Enzmann, Michael Settelen, and Nicolas Schärmeli. 2018. “Navigating Ambiguity : Distributive and Integrative Negotiation Tactics in China.” Central European Business Review 7 (2): 21–43. https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-3972.
Barthelmess Röthlisberger, Petra, et al. “Navigating Ambiguity : Distributive and Integrative Negotiation Tactics in China.” Central European Business Review, vol. 7, no. 2, 2018, pp. 21–43, https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-3972.


Alle Ressourcen in diesem Repository sind urheberrechtlich geschützt, soweit nicht anderweitig angezeigt.