| Publikationstyp: | Beitrag in wissenschaftlicher Zeitschrift |
| Art der Begutachtung: | Peer review (Publikation) |
| Titel: | Comparing conventional and new policy approaches for carnivore conservation : theoretical results and application to tiger conservation |
| Autor/-in: | Zabel, Astrid Pittel, Karen Bostedt, Göran Engel, Stefanie |
| DOI: | 10.1007/s10640-010-9411-4 |
| Erschienen in: | Environmental and Resource Economics |
| Band(Heft): | 48 |
| Heft: | 2 |
| Seite(n): | 287 |
| Seiten bis: | 301 |
| Erscheinungsdatum: | 2011 |
| Verlag / Hrsg. Institution: | Springer |
| ISSN: | 0924-6460 1573-1502 |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Schlagwörter: | Biodiversity conservation |
| Fachgebiet (DDC): | 333: Bodenwirtschaft und Ressourcen |
| Zusammenfassung: | New policy approaches to facilitate the co-existence of wildlife and livestock are needed for situations where predation incidents greatly impact households’ income and retaliatory killing threatens endangered carnivore species’ survival. In this paper, models are developed to assess how two alternative policy approaches impact a herder’s decisions on carnivore hunting and livestock protection. We find that while the well-established ex-post compensation policy induces suboptimal livestock protection it can generate sufficient incentives for the herder to refrain from hunting so that the carnivore population reaches its socially optimal level. Performance payments are proposed as alternative policy. They are found not to distort livestock protection incentives and can also help achieve a socially optimal carnivore population level. Which of the two scheme types gives rise to less cost is ambiguous. An empirical analysis of the model with data from tiger-livestock conflicts in India is presented. |
| URI: | https://digitalcollection.zhaw.ch/handle/11475/9131 |
| Volltext Version: | Publizierte Version |
| Lizenz (gemäss Verlagsvertrag): | Lizenz gemäss Verlagsvertrag |
| Departement: | School of Management and Law |
| Organisationseinheit: | Zentrum für Arbeitsmärkte, Digitalisierung und Regionalökonomie (CLDR) |
| Enthalten in den Sammlungen: | Publikationen School of Management and Law |
Dateien zu dieser Ressource:
Es gibt keine Dateien zu dieser Ressource.
Zur Langanzeige
Zabel, A., Pittel, K., Bostedt, G., & Engel, S. (2011). Comparing conventional and new policy approaches for carnivore conservation : theoretical results and application to tiger conservation. Environmental and Resource Economics, 48(2), 287–301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-010-9411-4
Zabel, A. et al. (2011) ‘Comparing conventional and new policy approaches for carnivore conservation : theoretical results and application to tiger conservation’, Environmental and Resource Economics, 48(2), pp. 287–301. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-010-9411-4.
A. Zabel, K. Pittel, G. Bostedt, and S. Engel, “Comparing conventional and new policy approaches for carnivore conservation : theoretical results and application to tiger conservation,” Environmental and Resource Economics, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 287–301, 2011, doi: 10.1007/s10640-010-9411-4.
ZABEL, Astrid, Karen PITTEL, Göran BOSTEDT und Stefanie ENGEL, 2011. Comparing conventional and new policy approaches for carnivore conservation : theoretical results and application to tiger conservation. Environmental and Resource Economics. 2011. Bd. 48, Nr. 2, S. 287–301. DOI 10.1007/s10640-010-9411-4
Zabel, Astrid, Karen Pittel, Göran Bostedt, and Stefanie Engel. 2011. “Comparing Conventional and New Policy Approaches for Carnivore Conservation : Theoretical Results and Application to Tiger Conservation.” Environmental and Resource Economics 48 (2): 287–301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-010-9411-4.
Zabel, Astrid, et al. “Comparing Conventional and New Policy Approaches for Carnivore Conservation : Theoretical Results and Application to Tiger Conservation.” Environmental and Resource Economics, vol. 48, no. 2, 2011, pp. 287–301, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-010-9411-4.
Alle Ressourcen in diesem Repository sind urheberrechtlich geschützt, soweit nicht anderweitig angezeigt.