Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-4232| Publication type: | Article in scientific journal |
| Type of review: | Peer review (publication) |
| Title: | Stakeholder dialogue for sustainability : the challenge of thinking between boxes |
| Authors: | Ejderyan, Olivier Carabias-Hütter, Vicente Kläy, Andreas Moschitz, Heidrun |
| DOI: | 10.21256/zhaw-4232 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2005.tb02210.x |
| Published in: | Gaia |
| Volume(Issue): | 25 |
| Issue: | 4 |
| Page(s): | 299 |
| Pages to: | 301 |
| Issue Date: | 2016 |
| Publisher / Ed. Institution: | oekom Verlag |
| Publisher / Ed. Institution: | München |
| ISSN: | 0940-5550 2625-5413 |
| Language: | English |
| Subjects: | Inter-sectorality; Participation; Sustainable development; Stakeholders |
| Subject (DDC): | 338.927: Environmental economics and sustainable development |
| Abstract: | Between November 2014 and May 2015 saguf board members participated in the Stakeholder Dialogue for Sustainability initiated by the Swiss Federal Council (Bundesrat). The goal of this consultation process was to inform and jointly advance the elaboration of the Federal Council’s Sustainable Development Strategy 2016-2019 (Swiss Federal Council 2016) that was adopted in January 2016. This contribution presents and discusses the Stakeholder Dialogue from saguf’s point of view. Its aim is to reflect on this experience and on the question of how an academic society dedicated to strengthening environmental research and education as a cornerstone for sustainability can contribute to processes such as the federal Stakeholder Dialogue. We argue that one central contribution is to make the case for an integrative approach to tackling sustainable development issues. This contribution presents and discusses the Stakeholder Dialogue from saguf's point of view. Its aim is to reflect on this experience and on the question of how an academic society dedicated to strengthening environmental research and education as a cornerstone for sustainability can contribute to processes such as the federal Stakeholder Dialogue. We argue that one central contribution is to make the case for an integrative approach to tackling sustainable development issues. |
| URI: | https://digitalcollection.zhaw.ch/handle/11475/5684 |
| Fulltext version: | Published version |
| License (according to publishing contract): | Licence according to publishing contract |
| Departement: | School of Engineering |
| Organisational Unit: | Institute of Sustainable Development (INE) |
| Published as part of the ZHAW project: | UNCTAD Strategic Foresight |
| Appears in collections: | Publikationen School of Engineering |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016_Ejderyan_Stakeholder Dialogue for Sustainability_GAIA.pdf | 313.65 kB | Adobe PDF |  View/Open |
Show full item record
Ejderyan, O., Carabias-Hütter, V., Kläy, A., & Moschitz, H. (2016). Stakeholder dialogue for sustainability : the challenge of thinking between boxes. Gaia, 25(4), 299–301. https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-4232
Ejderyan, O. et al. (2016) ‘Stakeholder dialogue for sustainability : the challenge of thinking between boxes’, Gaia, 25(4), pp. 299–301. Available at: https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-4232.
O. Ejderyan, V. Carabias-Hütter, A. Kläy, and H. Moschitz, “Stakeholder dialogue for sustainability : the challenge of thinking between boxes,” Gaia, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 299–301, 2016, doi: 10.21256/zhaw-4232.
EJDERYAN, Olivier, Vicente CARABIAS-HÜTTER, Andreas KLÄY und Heidrun MOSCHITZ, 2016. Stakeholder dialogue for sustainability : the challenge of thinking between boxes. Gaia. 2016. Bd. 25, Nr. 4, S. 299–301. DOI 10.21256/zhaw-4232
Ejderyan, Olivier, Vicente Carabias-Hütter, Andreas Kläy, and Heidrun Moschitz. 2016. “Stakeholder Dialogue for Sustainability : The Challenge of Thinking between Boxes.” Gaia 25 (4): 299–301. https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-4232.
Ejderyan, Olivier, et al. “Stakeholder Dialogue for Sustainability : The Challenge of Thinking between Boxes.” Gaia, vol. 25, no. 4, 2016, pp. 299–301, https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-4232.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.