Bitte benutzen Sie diese Kennung, um auf die Ressource zu verweisen: https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-29521
Publikationstyp: Beitrag in wissenschaftlicher Zeitschrift
Art der Begutachtung: Peer review (Publikation)
Titel: A qualitative comparison of ANSYS and OpenFOAM results for carbon dioxide plume transport
Autor/-in: Madsen, S.
Andleeb, Z.
Khawaja, H.
Boiger, Gernot Kurt
Moatamedi, M.
et. al: No
DOI: 10.21152/1750-9548.17.4.383
10.21256/zhaw-29521
Erschienen in: The International Journal of Multiphysics
Band(Heft): 17
Heft: 4
Seite(n): 383
Seiten bis: 406
Erscheinungsdatum: 2-Dez-2023
Verlag / Hrsg. Institution: International Society of Multiphysics
ISSN: 1750-9548
2048-3961
Sprache: Englisch
Schlagwörter: ANSYS; OpenFOAM; Multiphysics; Simulation; Transport model; Smoke plume; Carbon dioxide; Cruise ship
Fachgebiet (DDC): 005: Computerprogrammierung, Programme und Daten
530: Physik
Zusammenfassung: This research presents Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations in ANSYS® illustrating emissions of to the air. The CFD simulations is employed to study plume transport in urban environment, i.e., Breivika port in the city of Tromsø. The case study presents a two-phase model considering specific wind strength and direction in the city of Tromsø. Geographical coordinates, temperature, and wind data were obtained from the open sources, such as Google Maps, and Norwegian Meteorological Institute. The results from the simulations indicates a potential outcome with respect to various weather conditions. It was revealed for vessels less than 30 meter chimney height, the higher the wind strength, the lower the plume dispersion, causing the plume to stay closer to the terrain. This brings in a concentrated amount of pollutants closer to the public areas. The terrain in the model is recognizable for the Tromsø port’s location. From the CFD results, it is illustrated that onshore wind with high wind strength could affect the environment. The results simulated in OpenFOAM are qualitatively showing the same as visible in ANSYS®.
URI: https://digitalcollection.zhaw.ch/handle/11475/29521
Volltext Version: Publizierte Version
Lizenz (gemäss Verlagsvertrag): CC BY 4.0: Namensnennung 4.0 International
Departement: School of Engineering
Organisationseinheit: Institute of Computational Physics (ICP)
Enthalten in den Sammlungen:Publikationen School of Engineering

Dateien zu dieser Ressource:
Datei Beschreibung GrößeFormat 
2023_Madsen-etal_A-qualitative-comparison-ANSYS-openFOAM-results.pdf2.82 MBAdobe PDFMiniaturbild
Öffnen/Anzeigen
Zur Langanzeige
Madsen, S., Andleeb, Z., Khawaja, H., Boiger, G. K., & Moatamedi, M. (2023). A qualitative comparison of ANSYS and OpenFOAM results for carbon dioxide plume transport. The International Journal of Multiphysics, 17(4), 383–406. https://doi.org/10.21152/1750-9548.17.4.383
Madsen, S. et al. (2023) ‘A qualitative comparison of ANSYS and OpenFOAM results for carbon dioxide plume transport’, The International Journal of Multiphysics, 17(4), pp. 383–406. Available at: https://doi.org/10.21152/1750-9548.17.4.383.
S. Madsen, Z. Andleeb, H. Khawaja, G. K. Boiger, and M. Moatamedi, “A qualitative comparison of ANSYS and OpenFOAM results for carbon dioxide plume transport,” The International Journal of Multiphysics, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 383–406, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.21152/1750-9548.17.4.383.
MADSEN, S., Z. ANDLEEB, H. KHAWAJA, Gernot Kurt BOIGER und M. MOATAMEDI, 2023. A qualitative comparison of ANSYS and OpenFOAM results for carbon dioxide plume transport. The International Journal of Multiphysics. 2 Dezember 2023. Bd. 17, Nr. 4, S. 383–406. DOI 10.21152/1750-9548.17.4.383
Madsen, S., Z. Andleeb, H. Khawaja, Gernot Kurt Boiger, and M. Moatamedi. 2023. “A Qualitative Comparison of ANSYS and OpenFOAM Results for Carbon Dioxide Plume Transport.” The International Journal of Multiphysics 17 (4): 383–406. https://doi.org/10.21152/1750-9548.17.4.383.
Madsen, S., et al. “A Qualitative Comparison of ANSYS and OpenFOAM Results for Carbon Dioxide Plume Transport.” The International Journal of Multiphysics, vol. 17, no. 4, Dec. 2023, pp. 383–406, https://doi.org/10.21152/1750-9548.17.4.383.


Alle Ressourcen in diesem Repository sind urheberrechtlich geschützt, soweit nicht anderweitig angezeigt.