Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-25277
Publication type: | Article in scientific journal |
Type of review: | Peer review (publication) |
Title: | Distance decay 2.0 : a global synthesis of taxonomic and functional turnover in ecological communities |
Authors: | Graco‐Roza, Caio Aarnio, Sonja Abrego, Nerea Acosta, Alicia T. R. Alahuhta, Janne Altman, Jan Angiolini, Claudia Aroviita, Jukka Attorre, Fabio Baastrup‐Spohr, Lars Barrera‐Alba, José J. Belmaker, Jonathan Biurrun, Idoia Bonari, Gianmaria Bruelheide, Helge Burrascano, Sabina Carboni, Marta Cardoso, Pedro Carvalho, José C. Castaldelli, Giuseppe Christensen, Morten Correa, Gilsineia Dembicz, Iwona Dengler, Jürgen Dolezal, Jiri Domingos, Patricia Erös, Tibor Ferreira, Carlos E. L. Filibeck, Goffredo Floeter, Sergio R. Friedlander, Alan M. Gammal, Johanna Gavioli, Anna Gossner, Martin M. Granot, Itai Guarino, Riccardo Gustafsson, Camilla Hayden, Brian He, Siwen Heilmann‐Clausen, Jacob Heino, Jani Hunter, John T. Huszar, Vera L. M. Janišová, Monika Jyrkänkallio‐Mikkola, Jenny Kahilainen, Kimmo K. Kemppinen, Julia Kozub, Łukasz Kruk, Carla Kulbiki, Michel Kuzemko, Anna Christiaan le Roux, Peter Lehikoinen, Aleksi Teixeira de Lima, Domênica Lopez‐Urrutia, Angel Lukács, Balázs A. Luoto, Miska Mammola, Stefano Marinho, Marcelo M. Menezes, Luciana S. Milardi, Marco Miranda, Marcela Moser, Gleyci A. O. Mueller, Joerg Niittynen, Pekka Norkko, Alf Nowak, Arkadiusz Ometto, Jean P. Ovaskainen, Otso Overbeck, Gerhard E. Pacheco, Felipe S. Pajunen, Virpi Palpurina, Salza Picazo, Félix Prieto, Juan A. C. Rodil, Iván F. Sabatini, Francesco M. Salingré, Shira De Sanctis, Michele Segura, Angel M. da Silva, Lucia H. S. Stevanovic, Zora D. Swacha, Grzegorz Teittinen, Anette Tolonen, Kimmo T. Tsiripidis, Ioannis Virta, Leena Wang, Beixin Wang, Jianjun Weisser, Wolfgang Xu, Yuan Soininen, Janne |
et. al: | No |
DOI: | 10.1111/geb.13513 10.21256/zhaw-25277 |
Published in: | Global Ecology and Biogeography |
Volume(Issue): | 31 |
Issue: | 7 |
Page(s): | 1399 |
Pages to: | 1421 |
Issue Date: | 2022 |
Publisher / Ed. Institution: | Wiley |
ISSN: | 1466-8238 1466-822X |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | β- diversity; Spatial distance; Biogeography; Environmental gradient; Trait |
Subject (DDC): | 333.7: Land, natural recreational areas |
Abstract: | Aim: Understanding the variation in community composition and species abundances (i.e., β-diversity) is at the heart of community ecology. A common approach to examine β-diversity is to evaluate directional variation in community composition by measuring the decay in the similarity among pairs of communities along spatial or environmental distance. We provide the first global synthesis of taxonomic and functional distance decay along spatial and environmental distance by analysing 148 datasets comprising different types of organisms and environments. Location: Global. Time period: 1990 to present. Major taxa studied: From diatoms to mammals. Method: We measured the strength of the decay using ranked Mantel tests (Mantel r) and the rate of distance decay as the slope of an exponential fit using generalized linear models. We used null models to test whether functional similarity decays faster or slower than expected given the taxonomic decay along the spatial and environmental distance. We also unveiled the factors driving the rate of decay across the datasets, including latitude, spatial extent, realm and organismal features. Results: Taxonomic distance decay was stronger than functional distance decay along both spatial and environmental distance. Functional distance decay was random given the taxonomic distance decay. The rate of taxonomic and functional spatial distance decay was fastest in the datasets from mid-latitudes. Overall, datasets covering larger spatial extents showed a lower rate of decay along spatial distance but a higher rate of decay along environmental distance. Marine ecosystems had the slowest rate of decay along environmental distances. Main conclusions: In general, taxonomic distance decay is a useful tool for biogeographical research because it reflects dispersal-related factors in addition to species responses to climatic and environmental variables. Moreover, functional distance decay might be a cost-effective option for investigating community changes in heterogeneous environments. |
URI: | https://digitalcollection.zhaw.ch/handle/11475/25277 |
Fulltext version: | Published version |
License (according to publishing contract): | CC BY 4.0: Attribution 4.0 International |
Departement: | Life Sciences and Facility Management |
Organisational Unit: | Institute of Natural Resource Sciences (IUNR) |
Appears in collections: | Publikationen Life Sciences und Facility Management |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
2022_Graco‐Roza-etal_Distance-decay-global-synthesis.pdf | 5.55 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Show full item record
Graco‐Roza, C., Aarnio, S., Abrego, N., Acosta, A. T. R., Alahuhta, J., Altman, J., Angiolini, C., Aroviita, J., Attorre, F., Baastrup‐Spohr, L., Barrera‐Alba, J. J., Belmaker, J., Biurrun, I., Bonari, G., Bruelheide, H., Burrascano, S., Carboni, M., Cardoso, P., Carvalho, J. C., et al. (2022). Distance decay 2.0 : a global synthesis of taxonomic and functional turnover in ecological communities. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 31(7), 1399–1421. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.13513
Graco‐Roza, C. et al. (2022) ‘Distance decay 2.0 : a global synthesis of taxonomic and functional turnover in ecological communities’, Global Ecology and Biogeography, 31(7), pp. 1399–1421. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.13513.
C. Graco‐Roza et al., “Distance decay 2.0 : a global synthesis of taxonomic and functional turnover in ecological communities,” Global Ecology and Biogeography, vol. 31, no. 7, pp. 1399–1421, 2022, doi: 10.1111/geb.13513.
GRACO‐ROZA, Caio, Sonja AARNIO, Nerea ABREGO, Alicia T. R. ACOSTA, Janne ALAHUHTA, Jan ALTMAN, Claudia ANGIOLINI, Jukka AROVIITA, Fabio ATTORRE, Lars BAASTRUP‐SPOHR, José J. BARRERA‐ALBA, Jonathan BELMAKER, Idoia BIURRUN, Gianmaria BONARI, Helge BRUELHEIDE, Sabina BURRASCANO, Marta CARBONI, Pedro CARDOSO, José C. CARVALHO, Giuseppe CASTALDELLI, Morten CHRISTENSEN, Gilsineia CORREA, Iwona DEMBICZ, Jürgen DENGLER, Jiri DOLEZAL, Patricia DOMINGOS, Tibor ERÖS, Carlos E. L. FERREIRA, Goffredo FILIBECK, Sergio R. FLOETER, Alan M. FRIEDLANDER, Johanna GAMMAL, Anna GAVIOLI, Martin M. GOSSNER, Itai GRANOT, Riccardo GUARINO, Camilla GUSTAFSSON, Brian HAYDEN, Siwen HE, Jacob HEILMANN‐CLAUSEN, Jani HEINO, John T. HUNTER, Vera L. M. HUSZAR, Monika JANIŠOVÁ, Jenny JYRKÄNKALLIO‐MIKKOLA, Kimmo K. KAHILAINEN, Julia KEMPPINEN, Łukasz KOZUB, Carla KRUK, Michel KULBIKI, Anna KUZEMKO, Peter CHRISTIAAN LE ROUX, Aleksi LEHIKOINEN, Domênica TEIXEIRA DE LIMA, Angel LOPEZ‐URRUTIA, Balázs A. LUKÁCS, Miska LUOTO, Stefano MAMMOLA, Marcelo M. MARINHO, Luciana S. MENEZES, Marco MILARDI, Marcela MIRANDA, Gleyci A. O. MOSER, Joerg MUELLER, Pekka NIITTYNEN, Alf NORKKO, Arkadiusz NOWAK, Jean P. OMETTO, Otso OVASKAINEN, Gerhard E. OVERBECK, Felipe S. PACHECO, Virpi PAJUNEN, Salza PALPURINA, Félix PICAZO, Juan A. C. PRIETO, Iván F. RODIL, Francesco M. SABATINI, Shira SALINGRÉ, Michele DE SANCTIS, Angel M. SEGURA, Lucia H. S. DA SILVA, Zora D. STEVANOVIC, Grzegorz SWACHA, Anette TEITTINEN, Kimmo T. TOLONEN, Ioannis TSIRIPIDIS, Leena VIRTA, Beixin WANG, Jianjun WANG, Wolfgang WEISSER, Yuan XU und Janne SOININEN, 2022. Distance decay 2.0 : a global synthesis of taxonomic and functional turnover in ecological communities. Global Ecology and Biogeography. 2022. Bd. 31, Nr. 7, S. 1399–1421. DOI 10.1111/geb.13513
Graco‐Roza, Caio, Sonja Aarnio, Nerea Abrego, Alicia T. R. Acosta, Janne Alahuhta, Jan Altman, Claudia Angiolini, et al. 2022. “Distance Decay 2.0 : A Global Synthesis of Taxonomic and Functional Turnover in Ecological Communities.” Global Ecology and Biogeography 31 (7): 1399–1421. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.13513.
Graco‐Roza, Caio, et al. “Distance Decay 2.0 : A Global Synthesis of Taxonomic and Functional Turnover in Ecological Communities.” Global Ecology and Biogeography, vol. 31, no. 7, 2022, pp. 1399–421, https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.13513.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.