Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-21904
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMeylan, Grégoire-
dc.contributor.authorThiombiano, Boundia Alexandre-
dc.contributor.authorLe, Quang Bao-
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-04T07:59:30Z-
dc.date.available2021-03-04T07:59:30Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.issn1470-160Xde_CH
dc.identifier.urihttps://digitalcollection.zhaw.ch/handle/11475/21904-
dc.description.abstractDespite the many advantages of sustainable intensification (SI), the level of adoption of SI practices in African smallholding farms is still very low, highlighting the need for adequate methods for monitoring farm sustainability. Research on SI and related poverty alleviation strategies focus either on the “problems” or on the “solutions” for agricultural livelihood systems (ALS) with separate sets of indicators developed accordingly. Bridging the two approaches, we propose an indicator set to assess the criticality of a resource to ALSs in order to support smallholders, decision-makers, and practitioners in the process of SI. The set indicates what problems an ALS faces in the form of resource supply risks and the ALS’s ability to successfully cope with such problems, i.e., how resilient it is to these supply risks. We apply the ALS criticality approach (ALSCA) to macronutrients in three different ALS types in the village cluster of Pontieba, Ioba Province, Burkina Faso. Two criticality indicators are highlighted. First, the three ALS types are not facing equal nitrogen supply risks, when the latter is informed by depletion time. The depletion time indicates the time until which a resource stock is depleted at the current mining rate. The average depletion time of soil nitrogen stocks ranges from some 10 to 165 years. Second, the reliance on own resources is an indicator measuring resilience to supply restriction. In Pontieba, regardless of macronutrient, reliance on own nutrients never surpasses 50% when ALS averages are considered. The study showed that the ALSCA can contribute to the implementation of SI practices through support at four levels: 1) providing a holistic view on the ALS to avoid problem-shifting and enable prioritization, 2) providing options to reduce resource criticality, 3) mutual learning between ALSCA practitioners and smallholder farmers through knowledge integration, and 4) facilitating policy coherence from local to national levels thanks to the ALSCA’s applicability on different scales.de_CH
dc.language.isoende_CH
dc.publisherElsevierde_CH
dc.relation.ispartofEcological Indicatorsde_CH
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/de_CH
dc.subjectAgricultural livelihood systemde_CH
dc.subjectCriticality assessmentde_CH
dc.subjectMaterial flow analysisde_CH
dc.subjectSolution-oriented indicatorde_CH
dc.subjectSustainable intensificationde_CH
dc.subjectSystemic approachde_CH
dc.subject.ddc630: Landwirtschaftde_CH
dc.titleTowards assessing the resource criticality of agricultural livelihood systemsde_CH
dc.typeBeitrag in wissenschaftlicher Zeitschriftde_CH
dcterms.typeTextde_CH
zhaw.departementSchool of Management and Lawde_CH
zhaw.organisationalunitInternational Management Institute (IMI)de_CH
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107385de_CH
dc.identifier.doi10.21256/zhaw-21904-
zhaw.funding.euNode_CH
zhaw.issue107385de_CH
zhaw.originated.zhawYesde_CH
zhaw.publication.statuspublishedVersionde_CH
zhaw.volume124de_CH
zhaw.publication.reviewPeer review (Publikation)de_CH
zhaw.author.additionalNode_CH
zhaw.display.portraitYesde_CH
Appears in collections:Publikationen School of Management and Law

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2021_Meylan-etal_Resource-criticality-of-agricultural-livelihood-systems.pdf1.55 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record
Meylan, G., Thiombiano, B. A., & Le, Q. B. (2021). Towards assessing the resource criticality of agricultural livelihood systems. Ecological Indicators, 124(107385). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107385
Meylan, G., Thiombiano, B.A. and Le, Q.B. (2021) ‘Towards assessing the resource criticality of agricultural livelihood systems’, Ecological Indicators, 124(107385). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107385.
G. Meylan, B. A. Thiombiano, and Q. B. Le, “Towards assessing the resource criticality of agricultural livelihood systems,” Ecological Indicators, vol. 124, no. 107385, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107385.
MEYLAN, Grégoire, Boundia Alexandre THIOMBIANO und Quang Bao LE, 2021. Towards assessing the resource criticality of agricultural livelihood systems. Ecological Indicators. 2021. Bd. 124, Nr. 107385. DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107385
Meylan, Grégoire, Boundia Alexandre Thiombiano, and Quang Bao Le. 2021. “Towards Assessing the Resource Criticality of Agricultural Livelihood Systems.” Ecological Indicators 124 (107385). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107385.
Meylan, Grégoire, et al. “Towards Assessing the Resource Criticality of Agricultural Livelihood Systems.” Ecological Indicators, vol. 124, no. 107385, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107385.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.