1. ZHAW digitalcollection
  2. Gesundheit
  3. Publikationen
  4. Publikationen Gesundheit
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPinto, Cathryn-
dc.contributor.authorBristowe, Katherine-
dc.contributor.authorWitt, Jana-
dc.contributor.authorDavies, Joanna M.-
dc.contributor.authorde Wolf-Linder, Susanne-
dc.contributor.authorDawkins, Marsha-
dc.contributor.authorGuo, Ping-
dc.contributor.authorHigginson, Irene J.-
dc.contributor.authorDaveson, Barbara-
dc.contributor.authorMurtagh, Fliss E. M.-
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-21T14:42:14Z-
dc.date.available2018-11-21T14:42:14Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.issn2224-5820de_CH
dc.identifier.issn2224-5839de_CH
dc.identifier.urihttps://digitalcollection.zhaw.ch/handle/11475/13056-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Routine use of outcome measures in palliative care is recommended to demonstrate and improve quality of care. The use of outcome measures is relatively recent in UK specialist palliative care services and understanding their use in practice is key to successful implementation. We therefore aimed to explore how patient-centred outcome measures are used in specialist palliative care, and identify key considerations for implementation. Methods: Multi-method qualitative study (semi-structured interviews and non-participant observation). Patients, family caregivers and health professionals were purposively sampled from nine specialist palliative care services (hospice, hospital and community settings) in London, UK. Framework analysis, informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), was undertaken. Results: Thirty eight interviews and nine observations were conducted. Findings are presented according to the five CFIR domains: (I) intervention: participants highlighted advantages, disadvantages and appropriateness of outcome measures in palliative care; (II) outer setting: policy and national drivers are necessary to encourage use of outcome measures; (III) inner setting: information technology infrastructure, organisational drive, and support from peers and leadership were institutional factors that shaped the use of outcome measures; (IV) individual: clear rationale for using outcome measures and skills to use them in practice were essential; (V) implementation: stepwise introduction of outcome measures, regular feedback sessions, and champions/facilitators were important to strengthen routine use. Conclusions: All CFIR domains need consideration for effective implementation. Outcome data needs to be fed back to and interpreted for professionals in order to improve and sustain outcome data collection, and drive meaningful improvements in palliative care.de_CH
dc.language.isoende_CH
dc.publisherAME Publishingde_CH
dc.relation.ispartofAnnals of Palliative Medicinede_CH
dc.rightsLicence according to publishing contractde_CH
dc.subjectOutcome assessmentde_CH
dc.subjectEvaluation researchde_CH
dc.subjectPalliative carede_CH
dc.subjectQualitative researchde_CH
dc.subject.ddc616: Innere Medizin und Krankheitende_CH
dc.titlePerspectives of patients, family caregivers and health professionals on the use of outcome measures in palliative care and lessons for implementation : a multi-method qualitative studyde_CH
dc.typeBeitrag in wissenschaftlicher Zeitschriftde_CH
dcterms.typeTextde_CH
zhaw.departementGesundheitde_CH
zhaw.organisationalunitInstitut für Pflege (IPF)de_CH
dc.identifier.doi10.21037/apm.2018.09.02de_CH
dc.identifier.pmid30339764de_CH
zhaw.funding.euNode_CH
zhaw.issueSuppl 3de_CH
zhaw.originated.zhawYesde_CH
zhaw.pages.end150de_CH
zhaw.pages.start137de_CH
zhaw.publication.statuspublishedVersionde_CH
zhaw.volume7de_CH
zhaw.publication.reviewPeer review (Publikation)de_CH
Appears in collections:Publikationen Gesundheit

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Show simple item record
Pinto, C., Bristowe, K., Witt, J., Davies, J. M., de Wolf-Linder, S., Dawkins, M., Guo, P., Higginson, I. J., Daveson, B., & Murtagh, F. E. M. (2018). Perspectives of patients, family caregivers and health professionals on the use of outcome measures in palliative care and lessons for implementation : a multi-method qualitative study. Annals of Palliative Medicine, 7(Suppl 3), 137–150. https://doi.org/10.21037/apm.2018.09.02
Pinto, C. et al. (2018) ‘Perspectives of patients, family caregivers and health professionals on the use of outcome measures in palliative care and lessons for implementation : a multi-method qualitative study’, Annals of Palliative Medicine, 7(Suppl 3), pp. 137–150. Available at: https://doi.org/10.21037/apm.2018.09.02.
C. Pinto et al., “Perspectives of patients, family caregivers and health professionals on the use of outcome measures in palliative care and lessons for implementation : a multi-method qualitative study,” Annals of Palliative Medicine, vol. 7, no. Suppl 3, pp. 137–150, 2018, doi: 10.21037/apm.2018.09.02.
PINTO, Cathryn, Katherine BRISTOWE, Jana WITT, Joanna M. DAVIES, Susanne DE WOLF-LINDER, Marsha DAWKINS, Ping GUO, Irene J. HIGGINSON, Barbara DAVESON und Fliss E. M. MURTAGH, 2018. Perspectives of patients, family caregivers and health professionals on the use of outcome measures in palliative care and lessons for implementation : a multi-method qualitative study. Annals of Palliative Medicine. 2018. Bd. 7, Nr. Suppl 3, S. 137–150. DOI 10.21037/apm.2018.09.02
Pinto, Cathryn, Katherine Bristowe, Jana Witt, Joanna M. Davies, Susanne de Wolf-Linder, Marsha Dawkins, Ping Guo, Irene J. Higginson, Barbara Daveson, and Fliss E. M. Murtagh. 2018. “Perspectives of Patients, Family Caregivers and Health Professionals on the Use of Outcome Measures in Palliative Care and Lessons for Implementation : A Multi-Method Qualitative Study.” Annals of Palliative Medicine 7 (Suppl 3): 137–50. https://doi.org/10.21037/apm.2018.09.02.
Pinto, Cathryn, et al. “Perspectives of Patients, Family Caregivers and Health Professionals on the Use of Outcome Measures in Palliative Care and Lessons for Implementation : A Multi-Method Qualitative Study.” Annals of Palliative Medicine, vol. 7, no. Suppl 3, 2018, pp. 137–50, https://doi.org/10.21037/apm.2018.09.02.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.