| Publikationstyp: | Beitrag in wissenschaftlicher Zeitschrift |
| Art der Begutachtung: | Peer review (Publikation) |
| Titel: | Administrative tradition and management reforms : a comparison of agency chief executive accountability in four continental Rechtsstaat countries |
| Autor/-in: | Bach, Tobias van Thiel, Sandra Hammerschmid, Gerhard Steiner, Reto |
| DOI: | 10.1080/14719037.2016.1210205 |
| Erschienen in: | Public Management Review |
| Band(Heft): | 19 |
| Heft: | 6 |
| Seite(n): | 765 |
| Seiten bis: | 784 |
| Erscheinungsdatum: | 2017 |
| Verlag / Hrsg. Institution: | Taylor & Francis |
| ISSN: | 1471-9037 1471-9045 |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Fachgebiet (DDC): | 350: Öffentliche Verwaltung |
| Zusammenfassung: | This article investigates perceived accountability patterns of national agencies’chief executives in four countries with a Rechtsstaat tradition and tests theoretical expectations about potential tensions between managerial reforms and administrative values using survey data (N=453). All countries combine old and new forms of accountability requirements, while legal and financial accountability have not been replaced with results accountability. Switzerland and the Netherlands score highest on results accountability, though in combination with legal and financial accountability, which are dominant in Germany and Austria. Nation-specific characteristics seem more important for core values of public administration than generic characteristics of the Rechtsstaat model. |
| URI: | https://digitalcollection.zhaw.ch/handle/11475/12741 |
| Volltext Version: | Publizierte Version |
| Lizenz (gemäss Verlagsvertrag): | Lizenz gemäss Verlagsvertrag |
| Departement: | School of Management and Law |
| Enthalten in den Sammlungen: | Publikationen School of Management and Law |
Dateien zu dieser Ressource:
Es gibt keine Dateien zu dieser Ressource.
Zur Langanzeige
Bach, T., van Thiel, S., Hammerschmid, G., & Steiner, R. (2017). Administrative tradition and management reforms : a comparison of agency chief executive accountability in four continental Rechtsstaat countries. Public Management Review, 19(6), 765–784. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2016.1210205
Bach, T. et al. (2017) ‘Administrative tradition and management reforms : a comparison of agency chief executive accountability in four continental Rechtsstaat countries’, Public Management Review, 19(6), pp. 765–784. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2016.1210205.
T. Bach, S. van Thiel, G. Hammerschmid, and R. Steiner, “Administrative tradition and management reforms : a comparison of agency chief executive accountability in four continental Rechtsstaat countries,” Public Management Review, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 765–784, 2017, doi: 10.1080/14719037.2016.1210205.
BACH, Tobias, Sandra VAN THIEL, Gerhard HAMMERSCHMID und Reto STEINER, 2017. Administrative tradition and management reforms : a comparison of agency chief executive accountability in four continental Rechtsstaat countries. Public Management Review. 2017. Bd. 19, Nr. 6, S. 765–784. DOI 10.1080/14719037.2016.1210205
Bach, Tobias, Sandra van Thiel, Gerhard Hammerschmid, and Reto Steiner. 2017. “Administrative Tradition and Management Reforms : A Comparison of Agency Chief Executive Accountability in Four Continental Rechtsstaat Countries.” Public Management Review 19 (6): 765–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2016.1210205.
Bach, Tobias, et al. “Administrative Tradition and Management Reforms : A Comparison of Agency Chief Executive Accountability in Four Continental Rechtsstaat Countries.” Public Management Review, vol. 19, no. 6, 2017, pp. 765–84, https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2016.1210205.
Alle Ressourcen in diesem Repository sind urheberrechtlich geschützt, soweit nicht anderweitig angezeigt.