|Publication type:||Article in scientific journal|
|Type of review:||Peer review (publication)|
|Title:||Do institutions promote rationality? : an experimental study of the three-door anomaly|
|Published in:||Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization|
|Publisher / Ed. Institution:||Elsevier|
|Subjects:||Communication; Competition; Institution; Learning; Three door anomaly; Group decision making; Individual decision making|
|Subject (DDC):||150: Psychology |
|Abstract:||The three-door problem is an example of a systematic violation of a key rationality postulate that has attracted much attention. In this seemingly simple individual decision task, most people initially fail to apply correctly Bayes’ Law, and to make the payoff-maximizing choice. Previous experimental studies have shown that individual learning reduces the incidence of irrational choices somewhat, but is far from eliminating it. We experimentally study the roles of communication and competition as institutions to mitigate the choice anomaly. We show that the three-door anomaly can be entirely eliminated by these institutions.|
|Fulltext version:||Published version|
|License (according to publishing contract):||Licence according to publishing contract|
|Departement:||School of Management and Law|
|Organisational Unit:||Center for Economic Policy (FWP)|
|Appears in collections:||Publikationen School of Management and Law|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.