1. ZHAW digitalcollection
  2. School of Management and Law
  3. Publikationen
  4. Publikationen School of Management and Law
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLang, Achim-
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-22T14:25:01Z-
dc.date.available2018-08-22T14:25:01Z-
dc.date.issued2016-08-10-
dc.identifier.issn0095-3997de_CH
dc.identifier.issn1552-3039de_CH
dc.identifier.urihttps://digitalcollection.zhaw.ch/handle/11475/9352-
dc.description.abstractStimulating technological innovations and limiting access to expensive health technology require the coordination and coherence of overlapping policy sub-systems: research, market access, and reimbursement. This study investigates which procedural policy instruments proved more successful in integrating collaborative governance arrangements in Great Britain and Germany. A new classification of procedural policy instruments is developed based on the targeted dimensions of collaborative governance (network structure and policy phase). The comparative analysis rests on expert interviews and meeting records and reveals that, in Great Britain, active leadership prevails during the consultations, while Germany, in contrast, presents a case of inconsistent governance.de_CH
dc.language.isoende_CH
dc.publisherSagede_CH
dc.relation.ispartofAdministration & Societyde_CH
dc.rightsLicence according to publishing contractde_CH
dc.subjectPolicy integrationde_CH
dc.subjectHealth policyde_CH
dc.subjectPolicy instrumentsde_CH
dc.subjectCollaborative governancede_CH
dc.subjectMedical technologyde_CH
dc.subject.ddc320: Politikde_CH
dc.titleCollaborative governance in health and technology policy : the use and effects of procedural policy instrumentsde_CH
dc.typeBeitrag in wissenschaftlicher Zeitschriftde_CH
dcterms.typeTextde_CH
zhaw.departementSchool of Management and Lawde_CH
zhaw.organisationalunitInstitut für Verwaltungs-Management (IVM)de_CH
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0095399716664163de_CH
zhaw.funding.euNode_CH
zhaw.originated.zhawYesde_CH
zhaw.pages.end27de_CH
zhaw.pages.start1de_CH
zhaw.publication.statuspublishedVersionde_CH
zhaw.publication.reviewPeer review (Publikation)de_CH
zhaw.webfeedKooperative Verwaltungde_CH
Appears in collections:Publikationen School of Management and Law

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Show simple item record
Lang, A. (2016). Collaborative governance in health and technology policy : the use and effects of procedural policy instruments. Administration & Society, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399716664163
Lang, A. (2016) ‘Collaborative governance in health and technology policy : the use and effects of procedural policy instruments’, Administration & Society, pp. 1–27. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399716664163.
A. Lang, “Collaborative governance in health and technology policy : the use and effects of procedural policy instruments,” Administration & Society, pp. 1–27, Aug. 2016, doi: 10.1177/0095399716664163.
LANG, Achim, 2016. Collaborative governance in health and technology policy : the use and effects of procedural policy instruments. Administration & Society. 10 August 2016. S. 1–27. DOI 10.1177/0095399716664163
Lang, Achim. 2016. “Collaborative Governance in Health and Technology Policy : The Use and Effects of Procedural Policy Instruments.” Administration & Society, August, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399716664163.
Lang, Achim. “Collaborative Governance in Health and Technology Policy : The Use and Effects of Procedural Policy Instruments.” Administration & Society, Aug. 2016, pp. 1–27, https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399716664163.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.