1. ZHAW digitalcollection
  2. Rektorat und Ressorts
  3. Publikationen
  4. Publikationen Rektorat und Ressorts
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBamert, Manuel-
dc.contributor.authorStröbele, Maarit-
dc.contributor.authorBuchecker, Matthias-
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-17T12:58:29Z-
dc.date.available2018-08-17T12:58:29Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.issn0264-8377de_CH
dc.identifier.issn1873-5754de_CH
dc.identifier.urihttps://digitalcollection.zhaw.ch/handle/11475/9203-
dc.description.abstractSocial and economic developments in rural regions call for a discussion of strategies of dealing with redundant traditional buildings. Using a social science approach, our study examines how the local population in two rural regions perceives the built heritage and which factors are underlying these perceptions. People’s attitudes towards maintaining the cultural heritage vary considerably and are partly influenced by the socio-cultural and economic context of the region. The present article discusses some of the core regional socio-cultural influences on attitudes towards the rural built heritage. Following from qualitative interviews, the article concludes that the scale of perception of the built heritage is related to the “liveliness” of the local culture: The more original and distinctive the local culture is, and the more the local economy is still based on agriculture, the wider the scale of perception of the traditional cultural landscape and built heritage. In a region with local traditions that are alive and followed in everyday life, and a local economy that is mainly based on agriculture, the entire settlement structure is perceived as cultural heritage. In such areas, alternative uses should be found for redundant buildings. In contrast, in regions where the culture is less visible and alive nowadays and where the local economy has changed, people tend to perceive single buildings as representing their cultural heritage, and they often wish to preserve and conserve such remaining houses, barns and stables. In the study, we show that from a social science point of view, there is no universal perception of the maintenance of built cultural heritage. Rather, we see different views and opinions that are important to consider when it comes to developing heritage protection strategies together with public authorities.de_CH
dc.language.isoende_CH
dc.publisherElsevierde_CH
dc.relation.ispartofLand Use Policyde_CH
dc.rightsLicence according to publishing contractde_CH
dc.subjectPerceptionde_CH
dc.subjectAlpine landscapede_CH
dc.subjectCultural heritagede_CH
dc.subjectMaintenancede_CH
dc.subject.ddc333.7: Landflächen, Naturerholungsgebietede_CH
dc.subject.ddc725: Öffentliche Gebäudede_CH
dc.titleRamshackle farmhouses, useless old stables, or irreplaceable cultural heritage? Local inhabitants’ perspectives on future uses of the Walser built heritagede_CH
dc.typeBeitrag in wissenschaftlicher Zeitschriftde_CH
dcterms.typeTextde_CH
zhaw.departementRektorat und Ressortsde_CH
zhaw.organisationalunitRessort Forschung & Entwicklungde_CH
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.03.016de_CH
zhaw.funding.euNode_CH
zhaw.originated.zhawYesde_CH
zhaw.pages.end129de_CH
zhaw.pages.start121de_CH
zhaw.publication.statuspublishedVersionde_CH
zhaw.volume55de_CH
zhaw.publication.reviewPeer review (Publikation)de_CH
zhaw.webfeedRegionalentwicklungde_CH
Appears in collections:Publikationen Rektorat und Ressorts

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Show simple item record
Bamert, M., Ströbele, M., & Buchecker, M. (2016). Ramshackle farmhouses, useless old stables, or irreplaceable cultural heritage? Local inhabitants’ perspectives on future uses of the Walser built heritage. Land Use Policy, 55, 121–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.03.016
Bamert, M., Ströbele, M. and Buchecker, M. (2016) ‘Ramshackle farmhouses, useless old stables, or irreplaceable cultural heritage? Local inhabitants’ perspectives on future uses of the Walser built heritage’, Land Use Policy, 55, pp. 121–129. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.03.016.
M. Bamert, M. Ströbele, and M. Buchecker, “Ramshackle farmhouses, useless old stables, or irreplaceable cultural heritage? Local inhabitants’ perspectives on future uses of the Walser built heritage,” Land Use Policy, vol. 55, pp. 121–129, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.03.016.
BAMERT, Manuel, Maarit STRÖBELE und Matthias BUCHECKER, 2016. Ramshackle farmhouses, useless old stables, or irreplaceable cultural heritage? Local inhabitants’ perspectives on future uses of the Walser built heritage. Land Use Policy. 2016. Bd. 55, S. 121–129. DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.03.016
Bamert, Manuel, Maarit Ströbele, and Matthias Buchecker. 2016. “Ramshackle Farmhouses, Useless Old Stables, or Irreplaceable Cultural Heritage? Local Inhabitants’ Perspectives on Future Uses of the Walser Built Heritage.” Land Use Policy 55: 121–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.03.016.
Bamert, Manuel, et al. “Ramshackle Farmhouses, Useless Old Stables, or Irreplaceable Cultural Heritage? Local Inhabitants’ Perspectives on Future Uses of the Walser Built Heritage.” Land Use Policy, vol. 55, 2016, pp. 121–29, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.03.016.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.