Publikationstyp: Beitrag in wissenschaftlicher Zeitschrift
Art der Begutachtung: Peer review (Publikation)
Titel: Access to and use of everyday technology among older people : an occupational justice issue – but for whom?
Autor/-in: Kottorp, Anders Börje Mauritz
Nygård, Louise
Hedman, Annicka
Öhman, Annika
Malinowsky, Camilla
Rosenberg, Lena
Lindqvist, Eva
Ryd, Charlotta
DOI: 10.1080/14427591.2016.1151457
Erschienen in: Journal of Occupational Science
Band(Heft): 23
Heft: 3
Seite(n): 382
Seiten bis: 388
Erscheinungsdatum: 2016
Verlag / Hrsg. Institution: Taylor & Francis
ISSN: 1442-7591
2158-1576
Sprache: Englisch
Schlagwörter: Everyday Technology Use Questionnaire (ETUQ); Mild cognitive impairment; Dementia; Older adult; Everyday technology
Fachgebiet (DDC): 305: Personengruppen (Alter, Herkunft, Geschlecht, Einkommen)
600: Technik
Zusammenfassung: Research into older people's use of remote controls, mobile phones, digital home appliances, and computerized communication systems reveals that many have difficulty accessing and using these everyday technologies. By using occupational justice theory as a lens onto this technological development, we argue in this commentary that critical analysis of the findings from an occupational perspective reveals systematic injustices that disadvantage certain sectors of the older population. In particular we propose that, contrary to what might be expected, diagnosis or disability is not the sole marker for a vulnerable population at high risk of occupational injustices. Rather, the empirical findings support that other aspects (e.g., economic, educational) may also be influencing both everyday technology access and use among the older population. In light of these concerns, we argue that (a) occupation-centred outcome measures are needed to target everyday technology populations at risk of occupational injustices, and (b) future studies evaluating the access and use of everyday technology among older people must also monitor and target socio-demographic diversities.
URI: https://digitalcollection.zhaw.ch/handle/11475/8785
Volltext Version: Publizierte Version
Lizenz (gemäss Verlagsvertrag): Lizenz gemäss Verlagsvertrag
Departement: Gesundheit
Organisationseinheit: Institut für Ergotherapie (IER)
Enthalten in den Sammlungen:Publikationen Gesundheit

Dateien zu dieser Ressource:
Es gibt keine Dateien zu dieser Ressource.
Zur Langanzeige
Kottorp, A. B. M., Nygård, L., Hedman, A., Öhman, A., Malinowsky, C., Rosenberg, L., Lindqvist, E., & Ryd, C. (2016). Access to and use of everyday technology among older people : an occupational justice issue – but for whom? Journal of Occupational Science, 23(3), 382–388. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2016.1151457
Kottorp, A.B.M. et al. (2016) ‘Access to and use of everyday technology among older people : an occupational justice issue – but for whom?’, Journal of Occupational Science, 23(3), pp. 382–388. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2016.1151457.
A. B. M. Kottorp et al., “Access to and use of everyday technology among older people : an occupational justice issue – but for whom?,” Journal of Occupational Science, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 382–388, 2016, doi: 10.1080/14427591.2016.1151457.
KOTTORP, Anders Börje Mauritz, Louise NYGÅRD, Annicka HEDMAN, Annika ÖHMAN, Camilla MALINOWSKY, Lena ROSENBERG, Eva LINDQVIST und Charlotta RYD, 2016. Access to and use of everyday technology among older people : an occupational justice issue – but for whom? Journal of Occupational Science. 2016. Bd. 23, Nr. 3, S. 382–388. DOI 10.1080/14427591.2016.1151457
Kottorp, Anders Börje Mauritz, Louise Nygård, Annicka Hedman, Annika Öhman, Camilla Malinowsky, Lena Rosenberg, Eva Lindqvist, and Charlotta Ryd. 2016. “Access to and Use of Everyday Technology among Older People : An Occupational Justice Issue – but for Whom?” Journal of Occupational Science 23 (3): 382–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2016.1151457.
Kottorp, Anders Börje Mauritz, et al. “Access to and Use of Everyday Technology among Older People : An Occupational Justice Issue – but for Whom?” Journal of Occupational Science, vol. 23, no. 3, 2016, pp. 382–88, https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2016.1151457.


Alle Ressourcen in diesem Repository sind urheberrechtlich geschützt, soweit nicht anderweitig angezeigt.