1. ZHAW digitalcollection
  2. Gesundheit
  3. Publikationen
  4. Publikationen Gesundheit
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRyd, Charlotta-
dc.contributor.authorNygård, Louise-
dc.contributor.authorMalinowsky, Camilla-
dc.contributor.authorÖhman, Annika-
dc.contributor.authorKottorp, Anders Börje Mauritz-
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-02T08:36:03Z-
dc.date.available2018-08-02T08:36:03Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.issn0283-9318de_CH
dc.identifier.issn1471-6712de_CH
dc.identifier.urihttps://digitalcollection.zhaw.ch/handle/11475/8778-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: The number of older adults living with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or mild‐stage Alzheimer's disease (AD) is increasing and they are often expected to live in their own homes without support, despite limited ability to perform daily life activities. The Everyday Technology Use Questionnaire (ETUQ) has proven to be able to separate these groups and might also have potential to predict overall functional level (need of assistance in daily life activities) among them. Aim: To investigate whether the ETUQ can predict overall functional level among older adults with MCI or mild‐stage AD. Method: Participants were older adults with a mean age of 76 years with MCI (n = 28) or mild‐stage AD (n = 39). A three‐step scale indicating (i) independence, (ii) need for minimal assistance or (iii) need for moderate to maximal assistance in daily life was dichotomised in two ways and used as outcome variables in two logistic regression models. Predictors in both models were perceived ability to use everyday technology (ET) and amount of relevant everyday technologies measured by the ETUQ. Ethical approval was obtained from the regional Ethical Committee. Result: Perceived ability to use ET discriminated individuals who were independent or in need of minimal support from those in need of moderate to maximal assistance (OR = 1.82, p < 0.01, confidence interval = 95%; 1.76–2.82). The amount of relevant everyday technologies discriminated individuals who were independent from those in need of assistance at any level (OR = 1.39; p < 0.01; confidence interval = 95%; 1.11-1.75). Conclusion: Both perceived ability to use ET and amount of relevant everyday technologies had potential to predict overall function but at different levels. The findings support the predictive validity of the ETUQ and suggest further research for the development of clinical cut‐off criteria.de_CH
dc.language.isoende_CH
dc.publisherWileyde_CH
dc.relation.ispartofScandinavian Journal of Caring Sciencesde_CH
dc.rightsLicence according to publishing contractde_CH
dc.subjectActivities of daily livingde_CH
dc.subjectCognitive impairmentde_CH
dc.subjectDementiade_CH
dc.subjectIndependent livingde_CH
dc.subjectOccupational therapyde_CH
dc.subjectAdultde_CH
dc.subjectAgedde_CH
dc.subjectAged, 80 and overde_CH
dc.subjectAlzheimer Diseasede_CH
dc.subjectCognitive dysfunctionde_CH
dc.subjectFemalede_CH
dc.subjectHumande_CH
dc.subjectIndependent livingde_CH
dc.subjectMalede_CH
dc.subjectMiddle agedde_CH
dc.subjectPilot projectde_CH
dc.subjectSurvey and questionnairede_CH
dc.subjectDisability evaluationde_CH
dc.subjectTechnologyde_CH
dc.subject.ddc616.8: Neurologie und Krankheiten des Nervensystemsde_CH
dc.titleCan the everyday technology use questionnaire predict overall functional level among older adults with mild cognitive impairment or mild-stage alzheimer's disease? : a pilot studyde_CH
dc.typeBeitrag in wissenschaftlicher Zeitschriftde_CH
dcterms.typeTextde_CH
zhaw.departementGesundheitde_CH
zhaw.organisationalunitInstitut für Ergotherapie (IER)de_CH
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/scs.12330de_CH
dc.identifier.pmid27075107de_CH
zhaw.funding.euNode_CH
zhaw.issue1de_CH
zhaw.originated.zhawYesde_CH
zhaw.pages.end209de_CH
zhaw.pages.start201de_CH
zhaw.publication.statuspublishedVersionde_CH
zhaw.volume31de_CH
zhaw.publication.reviewPeer review (Publikation)de_CH
zhaw.webfeedAngewandte Gerontologiede_CH
Appears in collections:Publikationen Gesundheit

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Show simple item record
Ryd, C., Nygård, L., Malinowsky, C., Öhman, A., & Kottorp, A. B. M. (2017). Can the everyday technology use questionnaire predict overall functional level among older adults with mild cognitive impairment or mild-stage alzheimer’s disease? : a pilot study. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 31(1), 201–209. https://doi.org/10.1111/scs.12330
Ryd, C. et al. (2017) ‘Can the everyday technology use questionnaire predict overall functional level among older adults with mild cognitive impairment or mild-stage alzheimer’s disease? : a pilot study’, Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 31(1), pp. 201–209. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/scs.12330.
C. Ryd, L. Nygård, C. Malinowsky, A. Öhman, and A. B. M. Kottorp, “Can the everyday technology use questionnaire predict overall functional level among older adults with mild cognitive impairment or mild-stage alzheimer’s disease? : a pilot study,” Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 201–209, 2017, doi: 10.1111/scs.12330.
RYD, Charlotta, Louise NYGÅRD, Camilla MALINOWSKY, Annika ÖHMAN und Anders Börje Mauritz KOTTORP, 2017. Can the everyday technology use questionnaire predict overall functional level among older adults with mild cognitive impairment or mild-stage alzheimer’s disease? : a pilot study. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences. 2017. Bd. 31, Nr. 1, S. 201–209. DOI 10.1111/scs.12330
Ryd, Charlotta, Louise Nygård, Camilla Malinowsky, Annika Öhman, and Anders Börje Mauritz Kottorp. 2017. “Can the Everyday Technology Use Questionnaire Predict Overall Functional Level among Older Adults with Mild Cognitive Impairment or Mild-Stage Alzheimer’s Disease? : A Pilot Study.” Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences 31 (1): 201–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/scs.12330.
Ryd, Charlotta, et al. “Can the Everyday Technology Use Questionnaire Predict Overall Functional Level among Older Adults with Mild Cognitive Impairment or Mild-Stage Alzheimer’s Disease? : A Pilot Study.” Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, vol. 31, no. 1, 2017, pp. 201–9, https://doi.org/10.1111/scs.12330.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.