1. ZHAW digitalcollection
  2. Gesundheit
  3. Publikationen
  4. Publikationen Gesundheit
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKottorp, Anders-
dc.contributor.authorPetersson, Ingela-
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-23T12:05:51Z-
dc.date.available2018-07-23T12:05:51Z-
dc.date.issued2010-
dc.identifier.issn1103-8128de_CH
dc.identifier.issn1651-2014de_CH
dc.identifier.urihttps://digitalcollection.zhaw.ch/handle/11475/8410-
dc.description.abstractObjective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Assessment of Awareness of Disability (AAD), applied to a sample of clients with a variety of diagnoses, using two different Rasch models. Methods: The sample consisted of 245 clients admitted to occupational therapy services in Sweden. The psychometric properties of the AAD measures were analysed and compared using both Rasch partial credit (PCM) and rating scale (RSM) models. Results: In relation to rating scale properties and person response validity, the RSM yielded better results. However, the PCM demonstrated better item goodness-of-fit statistics than the RSM, supporting the internal scale validity of the AAD. Some systematic indications of sample-dependent misfit were also found in the data. Conclusion: The results support the validity of the AAD in a sample of clients with various diagnoses, although some limitations of the tool are addressed. The outcomes also demonstrate the importance of making cautious choices when selecting a Rasch model for investigating psychometric properties, as the choice has a substantial impact on the interpretation of the findings.de_CH
dc.language.isoende_CH
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisde_CH
dc.relation.ispartofScandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapyde_CH
dc.rightsLicence according to publishing contractde_CH
dc.subjectDisability evaluationde_CH
dc.subjectDisabled personde_CH
dc.subjectOccupational therapyde_CH
dc.subjectPsychometricsde_CH
dc.subject.ddc615.8515: Ergotherapiede_CH
dc.titlePsychometric evaluation of an assessment of awareness using two different Rasch modelsde_CH
dc.typeBeitrag in wissenschaftlicher Zeitschriftde_CH
dcterms.typeTextde_CH
zhaw.departementGesundheitde_CH
zhaw.organisationalunitInstitut für Ergotherapie (IER)de_CH
dc.identifier.doi10.3109/11038128.2010.521947de_CH
dc.identifier.pmid20950206de_CH
zhaw.funding.euNode_CH
zhaw.issue3de_CH
zhaw.originated.zhawYesde_CH
zhaw.pages.end230de_CH
zhaw.pages.start219de_CH
zhaw.publication.statuspublishedVersionde_CH
zhaw.volume18de_CH
zhaw.publication.reviewPeer review (Publikation)de_CH
Appears in collections:Publikationen Gesundheit

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Show simple item record
Kottorp, A., & Petersson, I. (2010). Psychometric evaluation of an assessment of awareness using two different Rasch models. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 18(3), 219–230. https://doi.org/10.3109/11038128.2010.521947
Kottorp, A. and Petersson, I. (2010) ‘Psychometric evaluation of an assessment of awareness using two different Rasch models’, Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 18(3), pp. 219–230. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3109/11038128.2010.521947.
A. Kottorp and I. Petersson, “Psychometric evaluation of an assessment of awareness using two different Rasch models,” Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 219–230, 2010, doi: 10.3109/11038128.2010.521947.
KOTTORP, Anders und Ingela PETERSSON, 2010. Psychometric evaluation of an assessment of awareness using two different Rasch models. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy. 2010. Bd. 18, Nr. 3, S. 219–230. DOI 10.3109/11038128.2010.521947
Kottorp, Anders, and Ingela Petersson. 2010. “Psychometric Evaluation of an Assessment of Awareness Using Two Different Rasch Models.” Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy 18 (3): 219–30. https://doi.org/10.3109/11038128.2010.521947.
Kottorp, Anders, and Ingela Petersson. “Psychometric Evaluation of an Assessment of Awareness Using Two Different Rasch Models.” Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, vol. 18, no. 3, 2010, pp. 219–30, https://doi.org/10.3109/11038128.2010.521947.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.