Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-4284
Title: Early versus late admission to labor affects labor progression and risk of cesarean section in nulliparous women
Authors : Mikolajczyk, Rafael T.
Zhang, Jun
Grewal, Jagteshwar
Chan, Linda C.
Petersen, Antje
Gross, Mechthild Maria
Published in : Frontiers in Medicine
Volume(Issue) : 3
Issue : 26
Publisher / Ed. Institution : Frontiers Research Foundation
Issue Date: 2016
License (according to publishing contract) : CC BY 4.0: Namensnennung 4.0 International
Type of review: Peer review (Publication)
Language : English
Subjects : Kaplan-Meier life table analysis; Cesarean section; Dilation; Early admission; Oxytocin; Timing of interventions
Subject (DDC) : 618.4: Childbirth
Abstract: Background: Rates of cesarean section increase worldwide, and the components of this increase are partially unknown. A strong role is prescribed to dystocia, and at the same time, the diagnosis of dystocia is highly subjective. Previous studies indicated that risk of cesarean is higher when women are admitted to the hospital early in the labor. Methods: We examined data on 1,202 nulliparous women with singleton, vertex pregnancies and spontaneous labor onset. We selected three groups based on cervical dilatation at admission: early (0.5–1.5 cm, N = 178), intermediate (2.5–3.5 cm, N = 320), and late (4.5–5.5 cm, N = 175). The Kaplan–Meier estimator was used to analyze the risk of delivery by cesarean section at a given dilatation, and thin-plate spline regression with a binary outcome (R library gam) to assess the form of the associations between the cesarean section in either the first or second stage versus vaginal delivery and dilatation at admission. Results: Women who were admitted to labor early had a higher risk of delivery by cesarean section (18 versus 4% in the late admission group), while the risk of instrumental delivery did not differ (24 versus 24%). Before 4 cm dilatation, the earlier a woman was admitted to labor, the higher was her risk of delivery by cesarean section. After 4 cm dilatation, however, the relationship disappeared. These patterns were true for both first and second stage cesarean deliveries. Oxytocin use was associated with a higher risk of cesarean section only in the middle group (2.5–3.5 cm dilatation at admission). Conclusion: Early admission to labor was associated with a significantly higher risk of delivery by cesarean section during the first and second stages. Differential effects of oxytocin augmentation depending on dilation at admission may suggest that admission at the early stage of labor is an indicator rather than a risk factor itself, but admission at the intermediate stage (2.5–3.5 cm) becomes a risk factor itself. Further research is needed to study this hypothesis.
Departement: Gesundheit
Organisational Unit: Institute of Midwifery (IHB)
Publication type: Article in scientific Journal
DOI : 10.3389/fmed.2016.00026
10.21256/zhaw-4284
ISSN: 2296-858X
URI: https://digitalcollection.zhaw.ch/handle/11475/8163
Appears in Collections:Publikationen Gesundheit

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2016_Gross_Early_versus_late_admission_to_labor.pdf630.3 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.