Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTonolla, Diego-
dc.contributor.authorBruder, Andreas-
dc.contributor.authorSchweizer, Steffen-
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-07T10:31:46Z-
dc.date.available2018-06-07T10:31:46Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.issn0048-9697de_CH
dc.identifier.issn1879-1026de_CH
dc.identifier.urihttps://digitalcollection.zhaw.ch/handle/11475/6663-
dc.description.abstractNew Swiss legislation obligates hydropower plant owners to reduce detrimental impacts on rivers ecosystems caused by hydropeaking. We used a case study in the Swiss Alps (hydropower company Kraftwerke Oberhasli AG) to develop an efficient and successful procedure for the ecological evaluation of such impacts, and to predict the effects of possible mitigation measures. We evaluated the following scenarios using 12 biotic and abiotic indicators: the pre-mitigation scenario (i.e. current state), the future scenario with increased turbine capacity but without mitigation measures, and future scenarios with increased turbine capacity and four alternative mitigation measures. The evaluation was based on representative hydrographs and quantitative or qualitative prediction of the indicators. Despite uncertainties in the ecological responses and the future operation mode of the hydropower plant, the procedure allowed the most appropriate mitigation measure to be identified. This measure combines a basin and a cavern at a total retention volume of 80,000m3, allowing for substantial dampening in the flow falling and ramping rates and in turn considerable reduction in stranding risk for juvenile trout and in macroinvertebrate drift. In general, this retention volume had the greatest predicted ecological benefit and can also, to some extent, compensate for possible modifications in the hydropower operation regime in the future, e.g. due to climate change, changes in the energy market, and changes in river morphology. Furthermore, it also allows for more specific seasonal regulations of retention volume during ecologically sensitive periods (e.g. fish spawning seasons). Overall experience gained from our case study is expected to support other hydropeaking mitigation projects.de_CH
dc.language.isoende_CH
dc.publisherElsevierde_CH
dc.relation.ispartofScience of the Total Environmentde_CH
dc.rightsLicence according to publishing contractde_CH
dc.subjectAlpine riverde_CH
dc.subjectAltered flow regimede_CH
dc.subjectEcological indicatorde_CH
dc.subjectHydropowerde_CH
dc.subjectRiver restorationde_CH
dc.subject.ddc577: Ökologiede_CH
dc.titleEvaluation of mitigation measures to reduce hydropeaking impacts on river ecosystems a a case study from the Swiss Alpsde_CH
dc.typeBeitrag in wissenschaftlicher Zeitschriftde_CH
dcterms.typeTextde_CH
zhaw.departementLife Sciences und Facility Managementde_CH
zhaw.organisationalunitInstitut für Umwelt und Natürliche Ressourcen (IUNR)de_CH
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.09.101de_CH
dc.identifier.pmid27653558de_CH
zhaw.funding.euNode_CH
zhaw.originated.zhawYesde_CH
zhaw.pages.end604de_CH
zhaw.pages.start594de_CH
zhaw.publication.statuspublishedVersionde_CH
zhaw.volume574de_CH
zhaw.publication.reviewPeer review (Publikation)de_CH
zhaw.webfeedÖkohydrologiede_CH
Appears in collections:Publikationen Life Sciences und Facility Management

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Show simple item record
Tonolla, D., Bruder, A., & Schweizer, S. (2017). Evaluation of mitigation measures to reduce hydropeaking impacts on river ecosystems a a case study from the Swiss Alps. Science of the Total Environment, 574, 594–604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.09.101
Tonolla, D., Bruder, A. and Schweizer, S. (2017) ‘Evaluation of mitigation measures to reduce hydropeaking impacts on river ecosystems a a case study from the Swiss Alps’, Science of the Total Environment, 574, pp. 594–604. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.09.101.
D. Tonolla, A. Bruder, and S. Schweizer, “Evaluation of mitigation measures to reduce hydropeaking impacts on river ecosystems a a case study from the Swiss Alps,” Science of the Total Environment, vol. 574, pp. 594–604, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.09.101.
TONOLLA, Diego, Andreas BRUDER und Steffen SCHWEIZER, 2017. Evaluation of mitigation measures to reduce hydropeaking impacts on river ecosystems a a case study from the Swiss Alps. Science of the Total Environment. 2017. Bd. 574, S. 594–604. DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.09.101
Tonolla, Diego, Andreas Bruder, and Steffen Schweizer. 2017. “Evaluation of Mitigation Measures to Reduce Hydropeaking Impacts on River Ecosystems a a Case Study from the Swiss Alps.” Science of the Total Environment 574: 594–604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.09.101.
Tonolla, Diego, et al. “Evaluation of Mitigation Measures to Reduce Hydropeaking Impacts on River Ecosystems a a Case Study from the Swiss Alps.” Science of the Total Environment, vol. 574, 2017, pp. 594–604, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.09.101.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.