Inconclusive evidence in support of the dopamine hypothesis of psychosis : why neurobiological research must consider medication use, adjust for important confounders, choose stringent comparators, and use larger samples

Hengartner, Michael Pascal; Moncrieff, Joanna

doi:10.21256/zhaw-3623

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-3623

Full metadata record

DC Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Hengartner, Michael Pascal	-
dc.contributor.author	Moncrieff, Joanna	-
dc.date.accessioned	2018-05-02T12:38:23Z	-
dc.date.available	2018-05-02T12:38:23Z	-
dc.date.issued	2018	-
dc.identifier.issn	1664-0640	de_CH
dc.identifier.uri	https://digitalcollection.zhaw.ch/handle/11475/5730	-
dc.language.iso	en	de_CH
dc.publisher	Frontiers Research Foundation	de_CH
dc.relation.ispartof	Frontiers in Psychiatry	de_CH
dc.rights	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/	de_CH
dc.subject.ddc	616.89: Psychische Störungen, klinische Psychologie und Psychiatrie	de_CH
dc.title	Inconclusive evidence in support of the dopamine hypothesis of psychosis : why neurobiological research must consider medication use, adjust for important confounders, choose stringent comparators, and use larger samples	de_CH
dc.type	Beitrag in wissenschaftlicher Zeitschrift	de_CH
dcterms.type	Text	de_CH
zhaw.departement	Angewandte Psychologie	de_CH
zhaw.organisationalunit	Psychologisches Institut (PI)	de_CH
dc.identifier.doi	10.21256/zhaw-3623	-
dc.identifier.doi	10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00174	de_CH
zhaw.funding.eu	No	de_CH
zhaw.issue	174	de_CH
zhaw.originated.zhaw	Yes	de_CH
zhaw.publication.status	publishedVersion	de_CH
zhaw.volume	9	de_CH
zhaw.publication.review	Open peer review	de_CH
zhaw.webfeed	Klinische Psychologie	de_CH
Appears in collections:	Publikationen Angewandte Psychologie

Files in This Item:

File	Description	Size	Format
Dopamine Hypothesis Psychosis.pdf	Paper	221.77 kB	Adobe PDF	View/Open

Show simple item record

Hengartner, M. P., & Moncrieff, J. (2018). Inconclusive evidence in support of the dopamine hypothesis of psychosis : why neurobiological research must consider medication use, adjust for important confounders, choose stringent comparators, and use larger samples. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 9(174). https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-3623

Hengartner, M.P. and Moncrieff, J. (2018) ‘Inconclusive evidence in support of the dopamine hypothesis of psychosis : why neurobiological research must consider medication use, adjust for important confounders, choose stringent comparators, and use larger samples’, Frontiers in Psychiatry, 9(174). Available at: https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-3623.

M. P. Hengartner and J. Moncrieff, “Inconclusive evidence in support of the dopamine hypothesis of psychosis : why neurobiological research must consider medication use, adjust for important confounders, choose stringent comparators, and use larger samples,” Frontiers in Psychiatry, vol. 9, no. 174, 2018, doi: 10.21256/zhaw-3623.

HENGARTNER, Michael Pascal und Joanna MONCRIEFF, 2018. Inconclusive evidence in support of the dopamine hypothesis of psychosis : why neurobiological research must consider medication use, adjust for important confounders, choose stringent comparators, and use larger samples. Frontiers in Psychiatry. 2018. Bd. 9, Nr. 174. DOI 10.21256/zhaw-3623

Hengartner, Michael Pascal, and Joanna Moncrieff. 2018. “Inconclusive Evidence in Support of the Dopamine Hypothesis of Psychosis : Why Neurobiological Research Must Consider Medication Use, Adjust for Important Confounders, Choose Stringent Comparators, and Use Larger Samples.” Frontiers in Psychiatry 9 (174). https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-3623.

Hengartner, Michael Pascal, and Joanna Moncrieff. “Inconclusive Evidence in Support of the Dopamine Hypothesis of Psychosis : Why Neurobiological Research Must Consider Medication Use, Adjust for Important Confounders, Choose Stringent Comparators, and Use Larger Samples.” Frontiers in Psychiatry, vol. 9, no. 174, 2018, https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-3623.