Inconclusive evidence in support of the dopamine hypothesis of psychosis : why neurobiological research must consider medication use, adjust for important confounders, choose stringent comparators, and use larger samples

Hengartner, Michael Pascal; Moncrieff, Joanna

doi:10.21256/zhaw-3623

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-3623

Publication type:	Article in scientific journal
Type of review:	Open peer review
Title:	Inconclusive evidence in support of the dopamine hypothesis of psychosis : why neurobiological research must consider medication use, adjust for important confounders, choose stringent comparators, and use larger samples
Authors:	Hengartner, Michael Pascal Moncrieff, Joanna
DOI:	10.21256/zhaw-3623 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00174
Published in:	Frontiers in Psychiatry
Volume(Issue):	9
Issue:	174
Issue Date:	2018
Publisher / Ed. Institution:	Frontiers Research Foundation
ISSN:	1664-0640
Language:	English
Subject (DDC):	616.89: Mental disorders, clinical psychology and psychiatry
URI:	https://digitalcollection.zhaw.ch/handle/11475/5730
Fulltext version:	Published version
License (according to publishing contract):	CC BY 4.0: Attribution 4.0 International
Departement:	Applied Psychology
Organisational Unit:	Psychological Institute (PI)
Appears in collections:	Publikationen Angewandte Psychologie

Files in This Item:

File	Description	Size	Format
Dopamine Hypothesis Psychosis.pdf	Paper	221.77 kB	Adobe PDF	View/Open

Show full item record

Hengartner, M. P., & Moncrieff, J. (2018). Inconclusive evidence in support of the dopamine hypothesis of psychosis : why neurobiological research must consider medication use, adjust for important confounders, choose stringent comparators, and use larger samples. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 9(174). https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-3623

Hengartner, M.P. and Moncrieff, J. (2018) ‘Inconclusive evidence in support of the dopamine hypothesis of psychosis : why neurobiological research must consider medication use, adjust for important confounders, choose stringent comparators, and use larger samples’, Frontiers in Psychiatry, 9(174). Available at: https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-3623.

M. P. Hengartner and J. Moncrieff, “Inconclusive evidence in support of the dopamine hypothesis of psychosis : why neurobiological research must consider medication use, adjust for important confounders, choose stringent comparators, and use larger samples,” Frontiers in Psychiatry, vol. 9, no. 174, 2018, doi: 10.21256/zhaw-3623.

HENGARTNER, Michael Pascal und Joanna MONCRIEFF, 2018. Inconclusive evidence in support of the dopamine hypothesis of psychosis : why neurobiological research must consider medication use, adjust for important confounders, choose stringent comparators, and use larger samples. Frontiers in Psychiatry. 2018. Bd. 9, Nr. 174. DOI 10.21256/zhaw-3623

Hengartner, Michael Pascal, and Joanna Moncrieff. 2018. “Inconclusive Evidence in Support of the Dopamine Hypothesis of Psychosis : Why Neurobiological Research Must Consider Medication Use, Adjust for Important Confounders, Choose Stringent Comparators, and Use Larger Samples.” Frontiers in Psychiatry 9 (174). https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-3623.

Hengartner, Michael Pascal, and Joanna Moncrieff. “Inconclusive Evidence in Support of the Dopamine Hypothesis of Psychosis : Why Neurobiological Research Must Consider Medication Use, Adjust for Important Confounders, Choose Stringent Comparators, and Use Larger Samples.” Frontiers in Psychiatry, vol. 9, no. 174, 2018, https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-3623.