Bitte benutzen Sie diese Kennung, um auf die Ressource zu verweisen:
https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-3623
Publikationstyp: | Beitrag in wissenschaftlicher Zeitschrift |
Art der Begutachtung: | Open peer review |
Titel: | Inconclusive evidence in support of the dopamine hypothesis of psychosis : why neurobiological research must consider medication use, adjust for important confounders, choose stringent comparators, and use larger samples |
Autor/-in: | Hengartner, Michael Pascal Moncrieff, Joanna |
DOI: | 10.21256/zhaw-3623 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00174 |
Erschienen in: | Frontiers in Psychiatry |
Band(Heft): | 9 |
Heft: | 174 |
Erscheinungsdatum: | 2018 |
Verlag / Hrsg. Institution: | Frontiers Research Foundation |
ISSN: | 1664-0640 |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Fachgebiet (DDC): | 616.89: Psychische Störungen, klinische Psychologie und Psychiatrie |
URI: | https://digitalcollection.zhaw.ch/handle/11475/5730 |
Volltext Version: | Publizierte Version |
Lizenz (gemäss Verlagsvertrag): | CC BY 4.0: Namensnennung 4.0 International |
Departement: | Angewandte Psychologie |
Organisationseinheit: | Psychologisches Institut (PI) |
Enthalten in den Sammlungen: | Publikationen Angewandte Psychologie |
Dateien zu dieser Ressource:
Datei | Beschreibung | Größe | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Dopamine Hypothesis Psychosis.pdf | Paper | 221.77 kB | Adobe PDF | Öffnen/Anzeigen |
Zur Langanzeige
Hengartner, M. P., & Moncrieff, J. (2018). Inconclusive evidence in support of the dopamine hypothesis of psychosis : why neurobiological research must consider medication use, adjust for important confounders, choose stringent comparators, and use larger samples. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 9(174). https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-3623
Hengartner, M.P. and Moncrieff, J. (2018) ‘Inconclusive evidence in support of the dopamine hypothesis of psychosis : why neurobiological research must consider medication use, adjust for important confounders, choose stringent comparators, and use larger samples’, Frontiers in Psychiatry, 9(174). Available at: https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-3623.
M. P. Hengartner and J. Moncrieff, “Inconclusive evidence in support of the dopamine hypothesis of psychosis : why neurobiological research must consider medication use, adjust for important confounders, choose stringent comparators, and use larger samples,” Frontiers in Psychiatry, vol. 9, no. 174, 2018, doi: 10.21256/zhaw-3623.
HENGARTNER, Michael Pascal und Joanna MONCRIEFF, 2018. Inconclusive evidence in support of the dopamine hypothesis of psychosis : why neurobiological research must consider medication use, adjust for important confounders, choose stringent comparators, and use larger samples. Frontiers in Psychiatry. 2018. Bd. 9, Nr. 174. DOI 10.21256/zhaw-3623
Hengartner, Michael Pascal, and Joanna Moncrieff. 2018. “Inconclusive Evidence in Support of the Dopamine Hypothesis of Psychosis : Why Neurobiological Research Must Consider Medication Use, Adjust for Important Confounders, Choose Stringent Comparators, and Use Larger Samples.” Frontiers in Psychiatry 9 (174). https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-3623.
Hengartner, Michael Pascal, and Joanna Moncrieff. “Inconclusive Evidence in Support of the Dopamine Hypothesis of Psychosis : Why Neurobiological Research Must Consider Medication Use, Adjust for Important Confounders, Choose Stringent Comparators, and Use Larger Samples.” Frontiers in Psychiatry, vol. 9, no. 174, 2018, https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-3623.
Alle Ressourcen in diesem Repository sind urheberrechtlich geschützt, soweit nicht anderweitig angezeigt.