Bitte benutzen Sie diese Kennung, um auf die Ressource zu verweisen: https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-3623
Publikationstyp: Beitrag in wissenschaftlicher Zeitschrift
Art der Begutachtung: Open peer review
Titel: Inconclusive evidence in support of the dopamine hypothesis of psychosis : why neurobiological research must consider medication use, adjust for important confounders, choose stringent comparators, and use larger samples
Autor/-in: Hengartner, Michael Pascal
Moncrieff, Joanna
DOI: 10.21256/zhaw-3623
10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00174
Erschienen in: Frontiers in Psychiatry
Band(Heft): 9
Heft: 174
Erscheinungsdatum: 2018
Verlag / Hrsg. Institution: Frontiers Research Foundation
ISSN: 1664-0640
Sprache: Englisch
Fachgebiet (DDC): 616.89: Psychische Störungen, klinische Psychologie und Psychiatrie
URI: https://digitalcollection.zhaw.ch/handle/11475/5730
Volltext Version: Publizierte Version
Lizenz (gemäss Verlagsvertrag): CC BY 4.0: Namensnennung 4.0 International
Departement: Angewandte Psychologie
Organisationseinheit: Psychologisches Institut (PI)
Enthalten in den Sammlungen:Publikationen Angewandte Psychologie

Dateien zu dieser Ressource:
Datei Beschreibung GrößeFormat 
Dopamine Hypothesis Psychosis.pdfPaper221.77 kBAdobe PDFMiniaturbild
Öffnen/Anzeigen
Zur Langanzeige
Hengartner, M. P., & Moncrieff, J. (2018). Inconclusive evidence in support of the dopamine hypothesis of psychosis : why neurobiological research must consider medication use, adjust for important confounders, choose stringent comparators, and use larger samples. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 9(174). https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-3623
Hengartner, M.P. and Moncrieff, J. (2018) ‘Inconclusive evidence in support of the dopamine hypothesis of psychosis : why neurobiological research must consider medication use, adjust for important confounders, choose stringent comparators, and use larger samples’, Frontiers in Psychiatry, 9(174). Available at: https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-3623.
M. P. Hengartner and J. Moncrieff, “Inconclusive evidence in support of the dopamine hypothesis of psychosis : why neurobiological research must consider medication use, adjust for important confounders, choose stringent comparators, and use larger samples,” Frontiers in Psychiatry, vol. 9, no. 174, 2018, doi: 10.21256/zhaw-3623.
HENGARTNER, Michael Pascal und Joanna MONCRIEFF, 2018. Inconclusive evidence in support of the dopamine hypothesis of psychosis : why neurobiological research must consider medication use, adjust for important confounders, choose stringent comparators, and use larger samples. Frontiers in Psychiatry. 2018. Bd. 9, Nr. 174. DOI 10.21256/zhaw-3623
Hengartner, Michael Pascal, and Joanna Moncrieff. 2018. “Inconclusive Evidence in Support of the Dopamine Hypothesis of Psychosis : Why Neurobiological Research Must Consider Medication Use, Adjust for Important Confounders, Choose Stringent Comparators, and Use Larger Samples.” Frontiers in Psychiatry 9 (174). https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-3623.
Hengartner, Michael Pascal, and Joanna Moncrieff. “Inconclusive Evidence in Support of the Dopamine Hypothesis of Psychosis : Why Neurobiological Research Must Consider Medication Use, Adjust for Important Confounders, Choose Stringent Comparators, and Use Larger Samples.” Frontiers in Psychiatry, vol. 9, no. 174, 2018, https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-3623.


Alle Ressourcen in diesem Repository sind urheberrechtlich geschützt, soweit nicht anderweitig angezeigt.