1. ZHAW digitalcollection
  2. Angewandte Linguistik
  3. Publikationen
  4. Publikationen Angewandte Linguistik
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMatic, Igor-
dc.contributor.authorDe Nardi, Gianni-
dc.contributor.authorSteiner, Felix-
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-12T13:42:49Z-
dc.date.available2022-01-12T13:42:49Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.issn1461-0213de_CH
dc.identifier.issn1570-5595de_CH
dc.identifier.urihttps://digitalcollection.zhaw.ch/handle/11475/23880-
dc.description.abstractMedical researchers are ethically and legally required to inform participants and get written permission before enrolling them into a human research project (Informed Consent). Accordingly, information and consent represent a complex procedure, and the participant concerned “must receive comprehensible oral and written information” (Swiss legislation: Human Research Act (HRA) Art. 16). A triangle of stakeholders is involved in the procedure: ethics committees that review and approve research projects and Informed Consent (IC) documents, medical researchers who produce the documents and discuss enrolment with patients, and patients who have to be informed comprehensibly. From a linguistic point of view, the question arises as to which perceptions of comprehensibility form the basis of the IC process and how shared language can be established considering the complex relationship between these stakeholders. This contribution presents findings from two perspectives (ethics committees and researchers) while considering the needs of all three stakeholders. Firstly, the conceptualisation of comprehensibility among three ethic committees is presented, and steps toward harmonisation are outlined. Secondly, limitations of how researchers conduct oral IC information are analysed, and the measures that were implemented to improve patient information are discussed. A transdisciplinary approach is key in establishing these solutions because they do not stem from linguistic analysis alone but have been developed in close collaboration with members of ethics committees and medical researchers. Thus, the project shows how the expertise of applied linguistics in cooperation with practitioners can deliver an important impact in both academic analysis and optimisation of professional procedures.de_CH
dc.language.isoende_CH
dc.publisherJohn Benjaminsde_CH
dc.relation.ispartofAILA Reviewde_CH
dc.rightsLicence according to publishing contractde_CH
dc.subjectComprehensibilityde_CH
dc.subjectShared languagede_CH
dc.subjectInformed consentde_CH
dc.subjectOral and written informationde_CH
dc.subjectTransdisciplinary action researchde_CH
dc.subjectVerständlichkeitde_CH
dc.subjectFachkommunikationde_CH
dc.subjectWissenstransferde_CH
dc.subjectGesundheitskommunikationde_CH
dc.subjectHealth communicationde_CH
dc.subject.ddc400: Sprache und Linguistikde_CH
dc.titleAnalysing and optimising Informed Consent in cooperation with ethics committees and medical researchersde_CH
dc.typeBeitrag in wissenschaftlicher Zeitschriftde_CH
dcterms.typeTextde_CH
zhaw.departementAngewandte Linguistikde_CH
zhaw.organisationalunitInstitute of Language Competence (ILC)de_CH
dc.identifier.doi10.1075/aila.20007.matde_CH
zhaw.funding.euNode_CH
zhaw.issue1de_CH
zhaw.originated.zhawYesde_CH
zhaw.pages.end56de_CH
zhaw.pages.start37de_CH
zhaw.publication.statuspublishedVersionde_CH
zhaw.volume34de_CH
zhaw.publication.reviewPeer review (Publikation)de_CH
zhaw.webfeedFachkommunikation und Wissenstransferde_CH
zhaw.funding.zhawInformed Consent in verständlicher Formde_CH
zhaw.funding.zhawAufklärung in verständlicher Form in der Humanforschungde_CH
zhaw.author.additionalNode_CH
zhaw.display.portraitYesde_CH
Appears in collections:Publikationen Angewandte Linguistik

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Show simple item record
Matic, I., De Nardi, G., & Steiner, F. (2021). Analysing and optimising Informed Consent in cooperation with ethics committees and medical researchers. AILA Review, 34(1), 37–56. https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.20007.mat
Matic, I., De Nardi, G. and Steiner, F. (2021) ‘Analysing and optimising Informed Consent in cooperation with ethics committees and medical researchers’, AILA Review, 34(1), pp. 37–56. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.20007.mat.
I. Matic, G. De Nardi, and F. Steiner, “Analysing and optimising Informed Consent in cooperation with ethics committees and medical researchers,” AILA Review, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 37–56, 2021, doi: 10.1075/aila.20007.mat.
MATIC, Igor, Gianni DE NARDI und Felix STEINER, 2021. Analysing and optimising Informed Consent in cooperation with ethics committees and medical researchers. AILA Review. 2021. Bd. 34, Nr. 1, S. 37–56. DOI 10.1075/aila.20007.mat
Matic, Igor, Gianni De Nardi, and Felix Steiner. 2021. “Analysing and Optimising Informed Consent in Cooperation with Ethics Committees and Medical Researchers.” AILA Review 34 (1): 37–56. https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.20007.mat.
Matic, Igor, et al. “Analysing and Optimising Informed Consent in Cooperation with Ethics Committees and Medical Researchers.” AILA Review, vol. 34, no. 1, 2021, pp. 37–56, https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.20007.mat.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.