Publikationstyp: Buch
Art der Begutachtung: Editorial review
Titel: Evidence-biased antidepressant prescription : overmedicalisation, flawed research, and conflicts of interest
Autor/-in: Hengartner, Michael P.
et. al: No
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-82587-4
Umfang: VII, 354
Erscheinungsdatum: Dez-2021
Verlag / Hrsg. Institution: Palgrave Macmillan
Verlag / Hrsg. Institution: London
ISBN: 978-3-030-82586-7
Sprache: Englisch
Schlagwörter: Antidepressant; Evidence-based medicine; Medical-industrial complex; Psychopharmacology; Method bias; Depression; Medication for depression; Pharmaceutical industry; Long-term harms of antidepressants
Fachgebiet (DDC): 615: Pharmakologie und Therapeutik
616.8: Neurologie und Krankheiten des Nervensystems
Zusammenfassung: This book addresses the over-prescribing of antidepressants in people with mostly mild and subthreshold depression. It outlines the steep increase in antidepressant prescription and critically examines the current scientific evidence on the efficacy and safety of antidepressants in depression. The book is not only concerned with the conflicting views as to whether antidepressants are useful or ineffective in various forms of depression, but also aims at detailing how flaws in the conduct and reporting of antidepressant trials have led to an overestimation of benefits and underestimation of harms. The transformation of the diagnostic concept of depression from a rare but serious disorder to an over-inclusive, highly prevalent but predominantly mild and self-limiting disorder is central to the books argument. It maintains that biological reductionism in psychiatry and pharmaceutical marketing reframed depression as a brain disorder, corroborating the overemphasis on drug treatment in both research and practice. Finally, the author goes on to explore how pharmaceutical companies have distorted the scientific literature on the efficacy and safety of antidepressants and how patient advocacy groups, leading academics, and medical organisations with pervasive financial ties to the industry helped to promote systematically biased benefit-harm evaluations, affecting public attitudes towards antidepressants as well as medical education, training, and practice.
Volltext Version: Publizierte Version
Lizenz (gemäss Verlagsvertrag): Lizenz gemäss Verlagsvertrag
Departement: Angewandte Psychologie
Organisationseinheit: Psychologisches Institut (PI)
Enthalten in den Sammlungen:Publikationen Angewandte Psychologie

Dateien zu dieser Ressource:
Es gibt keine Dateien zu dieser Ressource.
Zur Langanzeige

Alle Ressourcen in diesem Repository sind urheberrechtlich geschützt, soweit nicht anderweitig angezeigt.