|Publication type:||Article in scientific journal|
|Type of review:||Peer review (publication)|
|Title:||Relationship between the perceived burden of suffering and the observed quality of ADL task performance before and after a 12-week pain management programme|
Villiger, Peter M.
|Published in:||Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy|
|Publisher / Ed. Institution:||Taylor & Francis|
|Subjects:||Activities of daily living; Occupational therapy; Occupational performance; Chronic pain; Ergotherapie; Chronischer Schmerz; Performanz|
|Subject (DDC):||615.8515: Occupational therapy |
616.7: Diseases of musculoskeletal system and orthopaedics
|Abstract:||Background/objective: Constant pain causes suffering and affects performance of activities of daily living (ADL). In clients with chronic musculoskeletal pain, we wanted to determine (i) the relationship between the perceived burden of suffering (measured with the Pictorial Representation of Illness and Self Measure (PRISM)) and the observed quality of ADL task performance (measured with the Assessment of Motor and Process Skills (AMPS)); and (ii) the change in these assessments before and after a 12-week pain programme. Methods: In this cross-sectional cohort study, we retrospectively collected data from participants in a Swiss pain management programme. We calculated the relationship, correlations and effect sizes for the PRISM and AMPS using non-parametric tests. We set the level of significance at α = 0.05. Results: Out of 138 clients, 74 participated. We found no significant correlations between the PRISM and AMPS (p = 0.55–0.36), except for the PRISM and AMPS process ability measure after the pain management programme (p = 0.023). Pre-post-correlations of the AMPS and PRISM were significant, with medium to strong effect sizes (−0.48–0.66). Conclusion: Participation in this pain programme improved both, the PRISM and AMPS scores. The lack of correlation between these assessments in clients with chronic musculoskeletal pain, however, strongly argues for a thorough clinical assessment.|
|Fulltext version:||Published version|
|License (according to publishing contract):||Licence according to publishing contract|
|Departement:||School of Health Sciences|
|Organisational Unit:||Institute of Occupational Therapy (IER)|
|Appears in collections:||Publikationen Gesundheit|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.