1. ZHAW digitalcollection
  2. Life Sciences und Facility Management
  3. Publikationen
  4. Publikationen Life Sciences und Facility Management
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-22832
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBruelheide, Helge-
dc.contributor.authorJansen, Florian-
dc.contributor.authorJandt, Ute-
dc.contributor.authorBernhardt‐Römermann, Markus-
dc.contributor.authorBonn, Aletta-
dc.contributor.authorBowler, Diana-
dc.contributor.authorDengler, Jürgen-
dc.contributor.authorEichenberg, David-
dc.contributor.authorGrescho, Volker-
dc.contributor.authorKellner, Simon-
dc.contributor.authorKlenke, Reinhard A.-
dc.contributor.authorLütt, Silke-
dc.contributor.authorLüttgert, Lina-
dc.contributor.authorSabatini, Francesco Maria-
dc.contributor.authorWesche, Karsten-
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-22T12:07:32Z-
dc.date.available2021-07-22T12:07:32Z-
dc.date.issued2021-07-
dc.identifier.issn1366-9516de_CH
dc.identifier.issn1472-4642de_CH
dc.identifier.urihttps://digitalcollection.zhaw.ch/handle/11475/22832-
dc.description.abstractChristensen et al. criticized the application of Beals’ index of sociological favourability to adjust for incomplete species lists when comparing repeated surveys. Their main argument was that using Beals’ conditional occurrence probabilities would systematically underestimate biodiversity change compared to using observed frequencies. Although this might be the case for rare species, as we explicitly stated in our original publication, we here use a worked-out example to show that this criticism is unjustified for species that are sufficiently represented in the reference data set. In our opinion, the misconception derives from ignoring one of the key requirements for applying Beal's index, which is the use of a sufficiently large reference data set to derive a reliable co occurrence matrix. We here show how the predicted probability for the occurrence of a species depends on the size of the reference data set and give recommendations on the premises for applying Beals’ approach for monitoring purposes.de_CH
dc.language.isoende_CH
dc.publisherWileyde_CH
dc.relation.ispartofDiversity and Distributionsde_CH
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/de_CH
dc.subject.ddc580: Pflanzen (Botanik)de_CH
dc.titleA checklist for using Beals’ index with incomplete floristic monitoring data : reply to Christensen et al. (2021): Problems in using Beals’ index to detect species trends in incomplete floristic monitoring datade_CH
dc.typeBeitrag in wissenschaftlicher Zeitschriftde_CH
dcterms.typeTextde_CH
zhaw.departementLife Sciences und Facility Managementde_CH
zhaw.organisationalunitInstitut für Umwelt und Natürliche Ressourcen (IUNR)de_CH
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/ddi.13277de_CH
dc.identifier.doi10.21256/zhaw-22832-
zhaw.funding.euNode_CH
zhaw.issue7de_CH
zhaw.originated.zhawYesde_CH
zhaw.pages.end1333de_CH
zhaw.pages.start1328de_CH
zhaw.publication.statuspublishedVersionde_CH
zhaw.volume27de_CH
zhaw.publication.reviewPeer review (Publikation)de_CH
zhaw.webfeedVegetationsökologiede_CH
zhaw.author.additionalNode_CH
zhaw.display.portraitYesde_CH
Appears in collections:Publikationen Life Sciences und Facility Management

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2021_Bruelheide-etal_Checklist-Beals-index_ddi.pdf532.65 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record
Bruelheide, H., Jansen, F., Jandt, U., Bernhardt‐Römermann, M., Bonn, A., Bowler, D., Dengler, J., Eichenberg, D., Grescho, V., Kellner, S., Klenke, R. A., Lütt, S., Lüttgert, L., Sabatini, F. M., & Wesche, K. (2021). A checklist for using Beals’ index with incomplete floristic monitoring data : reply to Christensen et al. (2021): Problems in using Beals’ index to detect species trends in incomplete floristic monitoring data. Diversity and Distributions, 27(7), 1328–1333. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.13277
Bruelheide, H. et al. (2021) ‘A checklist for using Beals’ index with incomplete floristic monitoring data : reply to Christensen et al. (2021): Problems in using Beals’ index to detect species trends in incomplete floristic monitoring data’, Diversity and Distributions, 27(7), pp. 1328–1333. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.13277.
H. Bruelheide et al., “A checklist for using Beals’ index with incomplete floristic monitoring data : reply to Christensen et al. (2021): Problems in using Beals’ index to detect species trends in incomplete floristic monitoring data,” Diversity and Distributions, vol. 27, no. 7, pp. 1328–1333, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.1111/ddi.13277.
BRUELHEIDE, Helge, Florian JANSEN, Ute JANDT, Markus BERNHARDT‐RÖMERMANN, Aletta BONN, Diana BOWLER, Jürgen DENGLER, David EICHENBERG, Volker GRESCHO, Simon KELLNER, Reinhard A. KLENKE, Silke LÜTT, Lina LÜTTGERT, Francesco Maria SABATINI und Karsten WESCHE, 2021. A checklist for using Beals’ index with incomplete floristic monitoring data : reply to Christensen et al. (2021): Problems in using Beals’ index to detect species trends in incomplete floristic monitoring data. Diversity and Distributions. Juli 2021. Bd. 27, Nr. 7, S. 1328–1333. DOI 10.1111/ddi.13277
Bruelheide, Helge, Florian Jansen, Ute Jandt, Markus Bernhardt‐Römermann, Aletta Bonn, Diana Bowler, Jürgen Dengler, et al. 2021. “A Checklist for Using Beals’ Index with Incomplete Floristic Monitoring Data : Reply to Christensen et Al. (2021): Problems in Using Beals’ Index to Detect Species Trends in Incomplete Floristic Monitoring Data.” Diversity and Distributions 27 (7): 1328–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.13277.
Bruelheide, Helge, et al. “A Checklist for Using Beals’ Index with Incomplete Floristic Monitoring Data : Reply to Christensen et Al. (2021): Problems in Using Beals’ Index to Detect Species Trends in Incomplete Floristic Monitoring Data.” Diversity and Distributions, vol. 27, no. 7, July 2021, pp. 1328–33, https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.13277.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.