Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMattli, Renato-
dc.contributor.authorFarcher, Renato-
dc.contributor.authorSyleouni, Maria-Eleni-
dc.contributor.authorWieser, Simon-
dc.contributor.authorProbst-Hensch, Nicole-
dc.contributor.authorSchmidt-Trucksäss, Arno-
dc.contributor.authorSchwenkglenks, Matthias-
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-01T12:48:39Z-
dc.date.available2021-04-01T12:48:39Z-
dc.date.issued2019-11-21-
dc.identifier.issn0112-1642de_CH
dc.identifier.issn1179-2035de_CH
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.zora.uzh.ch/id/eprint/178405/de_CH
dc.identifier.urihttps://digitalcollection.zhaw.ch/handle/11475/22227-
dc.description.abstractBackground Physical inactivity is a worldwide pandemic associated with major chronic diseases. Given limited resources, policy makers are in need of physical activity interventions that provide best value for money. Objective To summarize evidence from RCT-based economic evaluations of primary prevention physical activity interventions in adult populations outside the workplace setting. Design Systematic review of health economic evaluations. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) in US$ per MET-hour gained were estimated on the basis of mean differences in intervention costs and standardized effects between intervention and control groups. Data Sources Identification of relevant studies via systematic searches in electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase and NHSEED). Eligibility Criteria Cost-effectiveness analyses in which all data (except unit costs) came from one RCT investigating physical activity interventions for primary prevention or health promotion in an adult population in high-income countries. Results In twelve eligible studies, 22 interventions were investigated. Interventions were based on advice, goal setting and follow-up support, exercise classes, financial incentives or teaching on behavioral change. The ICER varied widely among the interventions and four interventions showed an ICER below the applied benchmark of US$0.44 to US$0.63 per MET-hour gained. These four interventions were based on individualized advice via print or web. Conclusion We found evidence from RCTs indicating cost-effectiveness of some physical activity interventions for primary prevention in adults. However, the majority of interventions assessed would not be cost-effective according to the benchmark applied. Furthermore, our study showed that trial-based evidence on cost-effectiveness of physical activity interventions is scarce. Therefore, we recommend that future studies investigating the efficacy or effectiveness of such interventions consider costs as an additional outcome and assess cost-effectiveness.de_CH
dc.language.isoende_CH
dc.publisherSpringerde_CH
dc.relation.ispartofSports Medicinede_CH
dc.rightsLicence according to publishing contractde_CH
dc.subject.ddc613: Persönliche Gesundheitde_CH
dc.titlePhysical activity interventions for primary prevention in adults : a systematic review of randomized controlled trial-based economic evaluationsde_CH
dc.typeBeitrag in wissenschaftlicher Zeitschriftde_CH
dcterms.typeTextde_CH
zhaw.departementSchool of Management and Lawde_CH
zhaw.organisationalunitWinterthurer Institut für Gesundheitsökonomie (WIG)de_CH
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s40279-019-01233-3de_CH
dc.identifier.pmid31755043de_CH
zhaw.funding.euNode_CH
zhaw.issue4de_CH
zhaw.originated.zhawYesde_CH
zhaw.pages.end750de_CH
zhaw.pages.start731de_CH
zhaw.publication.statuspublishedVersionde_CH
zhaw.volume50de_CH
zhaw.publication.reviewPeer review (Publikation)de_CH
zhaw.author.additionalNode_CH
zhaw.display.portraitYesde_CH
Appears in collections:Publikationen School of Management and Law

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Show simple item record
Mattli, R., Farcher, R., Syleouni, M.-E., Wieser, S., Probst-Hensch, N., Schmidt-Trucksäss, A., & Schwenkglenks, M. (2019). Physical activity interventions for primary prevention in adults : a systematic review of randomized controlled trial-based economic evaluations. Sports Medicine, 50(4), 731–750. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-019-01233-3
Mattli, R. et al. (2019) ‘Physical activity interventions for primary prevention in adults : a systematic review of randomized controlled trial-based economic evaluations’, Sports Medicine, 50(4), pp. 731–750. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-019-01233-3.
R. Mattli et al., “Physical activity interventions for primary prevention in adults : a systematic review of randomized controlled trial-based economic evaluations,” Sports Medicine, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 731–750, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.1007/s40279-019-01233-3.
MATTLI, Renato, Renato FARCHER, Maria-Eleni SYLEOUNI, Simon WIESER, Nicole PROBST-HENSCH, Arno SCHMIDT-TRUCKSÄSS und Matthias SCHWENKGLENKS, 2019. Physical activity interventions for primary prevention in adults : a systematic review of randomized controlled trial-based economic evaluations. Sports Medicine [online]. 21 November 2019. Bd. 50, Nr. 4, S. 731–750. DOI 10.1007/s40279-019-01233-3. Verfügbar unter: https://www.zora.uzh.ch/id/eprint/178405/
Mattli, Renato, Renato Farcher, Maria-Eleni Syleouni, Simon Wieser, Nicole Probst-Hensch, Arno Schmidt-Trucksäss, and Matthias Schwenkglenks. 2019. “Physical Activity Interventions for Primary Prevention in Adults : A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trial-Based Economic Evaluations.” Sports Medicine 50 (4): 731–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-019-01233-3.
Mattli, Renato, et al. “Physical Activity Interventions for Primary Prevention in Adults : A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trial-Based Economic Evaluations.” Sports Medicine, vol. 50, no. 4, Nov. 2019, pp. 731–50, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-019-01233-3.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.