Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-21008
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorStoiber, Thomas-
dc.contributor.authorHoerler, Raphael-
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-11T13:27:15Z-
dc.date.available2020-12-11T13:27:15Z-
dc.date.issued2020-11-24-
dc.identifier.isbn978-1-7281-9503-2de_CH
dc.identifier.urihttps://digitalcollection.zhaw.ch/handle/11475/21008-
dc.description​© 2020 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. Permission from IEEE must be obtained for all other uses, in any current or future media, including reprinting/republishing this material for advertising or promotional purposes, creating new collective works, for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or reuse of any copyrighted component of this work in other works.de_CH
dc.description.abstractAutomated driving will trigger disruptive changes in the transportation system. Automated sharing and pooling options instead of private ownership are broadly discussed because of their possible contributions to climate change mitigation and sustainability. Despite the growing amount of literature on the adoption of these alternatives, little empirical evidence is available on the potential drivers of adoption, such as individuals’ socioeconomic background, mobility characteristics, attitudes, and values. To address this gap, we utilize the results of an online choice experiment involving 709 participants from Switzerland, which tested future mode choices considering automated cars, automated pooled-use taxis, and automated public transport shuttles, both for short- and long-term mobility decisions. Exploratory regression analysis explains the experiment outcome with a broad set of underlying data predicting willingness to use. Our findings illustrate that automated cars and automated public transport often appeal to the user groups of their traditional non-automated counterparts. However, this does not seem to be the case for automated pooled-use taxis, which we find to be associated with higher-income groups. Attributes on current mobility characteristics and values cannot be significantly associated with automated pooled-use taxis. We also demonstrate that short- and long-term mobility decisions are worth studying together in AV adoption studies.de_CH
dc.language.isoende_CH
dc.publisherIEEEde_CH
dc.rightsLicence according to publishing contractde_CH
dc.subjectPooled-use autonomous vehiclesde_CH
dc.subjectAttitudes and valuesde_CH
dc.subjectDrivers for adoptionde_CH
dc.subjectExploratory regression analysisde_CH
dc.subject.ddc380: Verkehrde_CH
dc.titleDrivers for utilizing pooled-use automated vehicles : empirical insights from Switzerlandde_CH
dc.typeKonferenz: Paperde_CH
dcterms.typeTextde_CH
zhaw.departementSchool of Engineeringde_CH
zhaw.organisationalunitInstitut für Nachhaltige Entwicklung (INE)de_CH
zhaw.publisher.placeDelftde_CH
dc.identifier.doi10.1109/FISTS46898.2020.9264900de_CH
dc.identifier.doi10.21256/zhaw-21008-
zhaw.conference.details2020 Forum on Integrated and Sustainable Transportation Systems (FISTS), Delft, Netherlands, Online, 3-5 November 2020de_CH
zhaw.funding.euNode_CH
zhaw.originated.zhawYesde_CH
zhaw.pages.end120de_CH
zhaw.pages.start114de_CH
zhaw.publication.statusacceptedVersionde_CH
zhaw.publication.reviewPeer review (Publikation)de_CH
zhaw.webfeedTransport und Mobilitätde_CH
zhaw.funding.zhawSCCER Efficient Technologies and Systems for Mobilityde_CH
zhaw.author.additionalNode_CH
zhaw.display.portraitYesde_CH
Appears in collections:Publikationen School of Engineering

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2020_Stoiber-Hoerler_Drivers-for-utilizing-pooled-use-automated-vehicles.pdfAccepted Version651.66 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.