1. ZHAW digitalcollection
  2. Soziale Arbeit
  3. Publikationen
  4. Publikationen Soziale Arbeit
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-19862
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHaunberger, Sigrid-
dc.contributor.authorHadjar, Andreas-
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-01T12:40:52Z-
dc.date.available2020-04-01T12:40:52Z-
dc.date.issued2020-02-11-
dc.identifier.issn0020-8728de_CH
dc.identifier.issn1461-7234de_CH
dc.identifier.urihttps://digitalcollection.zhaw.ch/handle/11475/19862-
dc.descriptionCopyright © 2020 Sagede_CH
dc.description.abstractIn this article, we discuss the question of why only a few men decide to study social science courses such as social work. While the conceptual base of our analysis includes the theory of planned behaviour and theories centring on gender role orientations, the empirical base is a random cluster sample of high-school graduates in Switzerland. The results show different gender effects, as well as direct and indirect effects, for all the theory of planned behaviour factors. Gender role orientations and the question of how a social science profession fits one’s own gender identity appear to be of particular importance only among male students.de_CH
dc.language.isoende_CH
dc.publisherSagede_CH
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Social Workde_CH
dc.rightsLicence according to publishing contractde_CH
dc.subjectGender role orientationde_CH
dc.subjectGender-specific study choicede_CH
dc.subjectSocial sciencesde_CH
dc.subjectSocial workde_CH
dc.subjectTheory of planned behaviourde_CH
dc.subject.ddc300: Sozialwissenschaftende_CH
dc.subject.ddc378: Hochschulbildungde_CH
dc.titleWhy are male students less likely to opt for social science courses? : a theory-driven analysisde_CH
dc.typeBeitrag in wissenschaftlicher Zeitschriftde_CH
dcterms.typeTextde_CH
zhaw.departementSoziale Arbeitde_CH
zhaw.organisationalunitInstitut für Sozialmanagement (ISM)de_CH
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0020872819884982de_CH
dc.identifier.doi10.21256/zhaw-19862-
zhaw.funding.euNode_CH
zhaw.issue1de_CH
zhaw.originated.zhawYesde_CH
zhaw.pages.end34de_CH
zhaw.pages.start17de_CH
zhaw.publication.statusacceptedVersionde_CH
zhaw.volume65de_CH
zhaw.publication.reviewPeer review (Publikation)de_CH
zhaw.author.additionalNode_CH
Appears in collections:Publikationen Soziale Arbeit

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2020_Haunberger-Hadjar_Male-Students-Social-Science-Courses.pdfAccepted Version466.06 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record
Haunberger, S., & Hadjar, A. (2020). Why are male students less likely to opt for social science courses? : a theory-driven analysis. International Social Work, 65(1), 17–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872819884982
Haunberger, S. and Hadjar, A. (2020) ‘Why are male students less likely to opt for social science courses? : a theory-driven analysis’, International Social Work, 65(1), pp. 17–34. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872819884982.
S. Haunberger and A. Hadjar, “Why are male students less likely to opt for social science courses? : a theory-driven analysis,” International Social Work, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 17–34, Feb. 2020, doi: 10.1177/0020872819884982.
HAUNBERGER, Sigrid und Andreas HADJAR, 2020. Why are male students less likely to opt for social science courses? : a theory-driven analysis. International Social Work. 11 Februar 2020. Bd. 65, Nr. 1, S. 17–34. DOI 10.1177/0020872819884982
Haunberger, Sigrid, and Andreas Hadjar. 2020. “Why Are Male Students Less Likely to Opt for Social Science Courses? : A Theory-Driven Analysis.” International Social Work 65 (1): 17–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872819884982.
Haunberger, Sigrid, and Andreas Hadjar. “Why Are Male Students Less Likely to Opt for Social Science Courses? : A Theory-Driven Analysis.” International Social Work, vol. 65, no. 1, Feb. 2020, pp. 17–34, https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872819884982.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.