Bitte benutzen Sie diese Kennung, um auf die Ressource zu verweisen:
https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-19458| Publikationstyp: | Beitrag in wissenschaftlicher Zeitschrift |
| Art der Begutachtung: | Peer review (Publikation) |
| Titel: | Process evaluation of a workplace-based health promotion and exercise cluster-randomised trial to increase productivity and reduce neck pain in office workers : a RE-AIM approach |
| Autor/-in: | Welch, Alyssa Healy, Genevieve Straker, Leon Comans, Tracy O'Leary, Shaun Melloh, Markus Sjøgaard, Gisela Pereira, Michelle Chen, Xiaoqi Johnston, Venerina |
| et. al: | No |
| DOI: | 10.1186/s12889-020-8208-9 10.21256/zhaw-19458 |
| Erschienen in: | BMC Public Health |
| Band(Heft): | 20 |
| Heft: | 180 |
| Erscheinungsdatum: | 4-Feb-2020 |
| Verlag / Hrsg. Institution: | BioMed Central |
| ISSN: | 1471-2458 |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Schlagwörter: | Effectiveness; Evaluation; Musculoskeletal disease; Occupational health; Workplace |
| Fachgebiet (DDC): | 610: Medizin und Gesundheit |
| Zusammenfassung: | Background: This study uses the RE-AIM framework to provide a process evaluation of a workplace-based cluster randomised trial comparing an ergonomic plus exercise intervention to an ergonomic plus health promotion intervention; and to highlight variations across organisations; and consider the implications of the findings for intervention translation. Method: This study applied the RE-AIM (reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, maintenance) methodology to examine the interventions’ implementation and to explore the extent to which differences between participating organisations contributed to the variations in findings. Qualitative and quantitative data collected from individual participants, research team observations and organisations were interrogated to report on the five RE-AIM domains. Results: Overall reach was 22.7% but varied across organisations (range 9 to 83%). Participants were generally representative of the recruitment pool though more females (n = 452 or 59%) were recruited than were in the pool (49%). Effectiveness measures (health-related productivity loss and neck pain) varied across all organisations, with no clear pattern emerging to indicate the source of the variation. Organisation-level adoption (66%) and staffing level adoption (91%) were high. The interventions were implemented with minimal protocol variations and high staffing consistency, but organisations varied in their provision of resources (e.g. training space, seniority of liaisons). Mean adherence of participants to the EET intervention was 56% during the intervention period, but varied from 41 to 71% across organisations. At 12 months, 15% of participants reported regular EET adherence. Overall mean (SD) adherence to EHP was 56% (29%) across organisations during the intervention period (range 28 to 77%), with 62% of participants reporting regular adherence at 12 months. No organisations continued the interventions after the follow-up period. Conclusion: Although the study protocol was implemented with high consistency and fidelity, variations in four domains (reach, effectiveness, adoption and implementation) arose between the 14 participating organisations. These variations may be the source of mixed effectiveness across organisations. Factors known to increase the success of workplace interventions, such as strong management support, a visible commitment to employee wellbeing and participant engagement in intervention design should be considered and adequately measured for future interventions. |
| URI: | https://digitalcollection.zhaw.ch/handle/11475/19458 |
| Volltext Version: | Publizierte Version |
| Lizenz (gemäss Verlagsvertrag): | CC BY 4.0: Namensnennung 4.0 International |
| Departement: | Gesundheit |
| Organisationseinheit: | Institut für Public Health (IPH) |
| Enthalten in den Sammlungen: | Publikationen Gesundheit |
Dateien zu dieser Ressource:
| Datei | Beschreibung | Größe | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020_Process evaluation of a workplace-based health promotion.pdf | 1.67 MB | Adobe PDF |  Öffnen/Anzeigen |
Zur Langanzeige
Welch, A., Healy, G., Straker, L., Comans, T., O’Leary, S., Melloh, M., Sjøgaard, G., Pereira, M., Chen, X., & Johnston, V. (2020). Process evaluation of a workplace-based health promotion and exercise cluster-randomised trial to increase productivity and reduce neck pain in office workers : a RE-AIM approach. BMC Public Health, 20(180). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-8208-9
Welch, A. et al. (2020) ‘Process evaluation of a workplace-based health promotion and exercise cluster-randomised trial to increase productivity and reduce neck pain in office workers : a RE-AIM approach’, BMC Public Health, 20(180). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-8208-9.
A. Welch et al., “Process evaluation of a workplace-based health promotion and exercise cluster-randomised trial to increase productivity and reduce neck pain in office workers : a RE-AIM approach,” BMC Public Health, vol. 20, no. 180, Feb. 2020, doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-8208-9.
WELCH, Alyssa, Genevieve HEALY, Leon STRAKER, Tracy COMANS, Shaun O’LEARY, Markus MELLOH, Gisela SJØGAARD, Michelle PEREIRA, Xiaoqi CHEN und Venerina JOHNSTON, 2020. Process evaluation of a workplace-based health promotion and exercise cluster-randomised trial to increase productivity and reduce neck pain in office workers : a RE-AIM approach. BMC Public Health. 4 Februar 2020. Bd. 20, Nr. 180. DOI 10.1186/s12889-020-8208-9
Welch, Alyssa, Genevieve Healy, Leon Straker, Tracy Comans, Shaun O’Leary, Markus Melloh, Gisela Sjøgaard, Michelle Pereira, Xiaoqi Chen, and Venerina Johnston. 2020. “Process Evaluation of a Workplace-Based Health Promotion and Exercise Cluster-Randomised Trial to Increase Productivity and Reduce Neck Pain in Office Workers : A RE-AIM Approach.” BMC Public Health 20 (180). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-8208-9.
Welch, Alyssa, et al. “Process Evaluation of a Workplace-Based Health Promotion and Exercise Cluster-Randomised Trial to Increase Productivity and Reduce Neck Pain in Office Workers : A RE-AIM Approach.” BMC Public Health, vol. 20, no. 180, Feb. 2020, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-8208-9.
Alle Ressourcen in diesem Repository sind urheberrechtlich geschützt, soweit nicht anderweitig angezeigt.